I guess the correct answers are A and B only
Using a deerskin as money may not be as widely accepted as using paper money.
Using a deerskin as money incurs a much larger transactions cost because it is bigger and heavier than paper money.
A paymеnt systеm is any systеm usеd tο sеttlе financial transactiοns thrοugh thе transfеr οf mοnеtary valuе, and includеs thе institutiοns, instrumеnts, pеοplе, rulеs, prοcеdurеs, standards, and tеchnοlοgiеs that makе such an еxchangе pοssiblе.
$29.70
$31.04
$28.29
Wages are 28.15 annual raise is 5%
Answer:
$29.70
Explanation:
The computation of the per hour pay is shown below:
= Wages × (1 + total raise)
where,
Wages is $28.15
And, the total raise would be
= 1 + (0.5% + 5%)
= 1 + 5.5%
= 1 + 0.055
= 1.055
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $28.15 × 1.055
= $29.70
We simply multiplied the wages by the total raise percentage
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
1.
Selling Price = Sales ÷ Units Sold
Current Selling Price = $385,000 ÷ 5500
= $70
Now
Expected Selling Price per unit = $70 + ($70× 10%)
= $77
Now
Expected Sales = 5500 × $77
= $423,500
Now
Net Income = Sales - Variable Cost - Fixed Cost
= $423,500 - $250,000 - $94,000
2.
Sales = $385000
Variable cost = $385,000 × 56% = $215,600
Sales $385,000
Less: variable cost -$215,600
Contribution Margin $169,400
Les: fixed cost -$94,000
Net Income $75,400
As we can see that if there is an increase in Selling Price by 10% so it would produce highest Net Income.
Comparing two scenarios for Carla Vista Company: one of increasing the selling price by 10%, and the other of reducing the variable costs to 56% of sales, the former scenario of increasing the selling price provides a higher net income and is the better strategy.
The question asks us to calculate the net income under two different scenarios for Carla Vista Company, and then determine which option produces the higher net income.
To do this, we first need to understand the company's current situation.
Its current net income is calculated as follows: Sales ($385,000) - Variable Costs ($250,000) - Fixed Costs ($94,000) = $41,000.
Under the first alternative, management plans to increase the selling price by 10% without any changes in total variable costs or units sold.
So the new sales figure will be $385,000 + 10% of $385,000 = $423,500.
The net income then becomes: New Sales ($423,500) - Variable Costs ($250,000) - Fixed Costs ($94,000) = $79,500.
Under the second alternative, management plans to reduce variable costs to 56% of sales.
So, the new variable costs will be 56% of $385,000 = $215,600.
The net income then becomes: Sales ($385,000) - New Variable Costs ($215,600) - Fixed Costs ($94,000) = $75,400.
Comparing the two alternatives, we see that the first alternative, increasing the selling price by 10%, gives a higher net income and should thus be the advisable course of action.
Learn more about Net Income here:
#SPJ3
Answer:
Yes the statement does
Explanation:
Retaining small predictable layers of risk and transferring the unpredictable catastrophic layer of risk to a more capable body is a very good approach towards promoting appropriate risk financing decision making, this is because
Financial risk decisions are decisions taken between alternatives i.e risks associated with business activities . it is more appropriate to take alternatives with a predictable layer of risk,that way it would be easier for the management to handle the risk associated with it, while transferring the unpredictable catastrophic layer of risk to a more capable body ,like the Insurance companies .
C. sell; rise; fall
D. buy; fall; rise
Answer:
A. buy; rise; fall
Explanation:
As for the provided information, we know,
As the supply of money exceeds the demand people will have more investing power, accordingly people will buy more bonds,
as more and more people will try to buy the bonds the price for bond because of high demand will automatically due to demand and supply proportion will rise,
and then to control the demand of bond, and control the purchase of bond, the nominal interest rate provided on bonds will fall.
b. It shifts to the left
c. It does not change
Answer:b. It shifts to the left
Explanation:
The supply will increases as price increases and vice versa. When the price increases and supply also increases the supply curves shifts to the right and when the price decreases and supply equally decreases supply curves shifts to the left.
In the above scenario since bracelet and necklace are exclusive products the sellers will be willing to supply more of necklace since the price has increased and less of bracelet since the price has fallen and the fall in price which leads to fall in supply of bracelet will shift bracelet supply curves to the left.