The sentence framed using the words "cite" and "evidence" is "Cite evidence from the textbook to support your analysis."
Examining citations is known as citation analysis. By calculating the number of times an author, article, or publication has been cited by other works, citation analysis can determine the relative relevance or impact of those individuals.
You must be aware of the author, title, publication date, publisher, and location. You'll also need to know the volume and issue number for any journals or periodicals.
Make a note of the URL and the day you accessed the material for online sources. Keep track of the page numbers for any quotes you want to cite.
Citation analysis uses numerous methods, like citation counts, to identify patterns and influences in scholarly output.
Citation searching records where works (articles, books, conference proceedings, etc.) have been cited by other authors, in contrast to standard database searching by Author or Subject.
Check out the link below to learn more about cite-evidence;
#SPJ2
A
For example
B
For example, Instead
C
would
D
Instead, would
Question: Which sentence is punctuated correctly?
Options:
Answer: The correct answer is:
Explanation: When a conjunction joins two independent clauses, a comma is needed before the conjunction. In the answer chosen, we can observe that it uses a comma before the conjunction ''and,'' which is linking two independent clauses. This is the correct form to use the comma.
Answer:
The answer is the last option: Our class is learning about plant cells, and Reza’s class is learning about animal cells.
Explanation:
This question concerns the use of commas to punctuate correctly. The reasons why the first three sentences are incorrect are as follows:
1. They use commas to separate the subject and the verb:
- and Reza’s class, is learning about animal cells (sentence 1);
- Our class, is learning about plant cells and Reza’s class, is learning about animal cells (sentence 2).
2. They use a comma to separate the verb and the object for no apparent reason:
- Our class is learning, about plant cells (sentence 1).
3. They do not use a comma to separate two independent clauses connected by the coordinating conjunction "and":
- Our class is learning about plant cells and Reza’s class is learning about animal cells.
That's why sentence 4 is the correct one. It properly uses a comma to separate the two independent clauses connected by "and". It does not separate subjects from verbs or verbs from their objects.
- Our class is learning about plant cells, and Reza’s class is learning about animal cells.
Answer:
all of the above
Explanation: