Answer:
The Silk Road and Indian Ocean trading routes were similar in that they both served the purpose of moving luxury goods from East Asia to the markets of the Mediterranean and Europe via the Middle East. Both routes specialized in luxury goods, namely silk, porcelain, and spices.
Explanation:
The policy of _______ kept other countries from stopping Hitler early on and resulted in the Munich Agreement.
Also known as D-Day, _______ successfully invaded France by coastline, allowing for the liberation of Paris.
The United States entered World War II after the Japanese attack on _______.
The _______ was a turning point in the war between the United States and Japan and first demonstrated the success of the island-hopping strategy.
To secure an unconditional surrender from Japan, the United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of _______ and _______.
Answer:
Treaty of Versailles
Nazi
appeasement
Operation Overlord
Pearl Harbor
Battle of Midway
Hiroshima; Nagasaki
In both the European and Pacific Theaters, a growing desire to increase national power and expand territory contributed to the start of World War II. In Europe, Germany ignored the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, expanding its military and invading other nations. In the Pacific, Japan sought to control more territory, leading to the invasion of China and, eventually, to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
While the Nazi military strategy of blitzkrieg was wildly successful in most of Europe, it failed in both Britain and the Soviet Union. As an island nation, Britain was safe from land attacks and managed to withstand and resist Nazi air assaults. In the Soviet Union, a combination of brutal winters and a willingness to sacrifice Soviet lives combined to defeat the Nazi army.
Answers will vary. On the one hand, students may argue that the bomb was justifiable to end further loss of lives. By dropping a bomb that was so devastating, it showed that the United States and the Allies were willing to annihilate their enemies—forcing them to either be destroyed completely or surrender. Along with this reasoning, students might point to the Potsdam Declaration argue that the Japanese were warned. On the other hand, students may argue that they were not justifiable—that the targeting of civilians is not ethical and that no act of military aggression should be a reason to kill hundreds of thousands of individuals and destroy lands and ecosystems. Along with this reasoning, students might claim that no one nation or person has the right to wield such total power.
Explanation:
Answer:
Treaty of Versailles
Nazi
appeasement
Operation Overlord
Pearl Harbor
Battle of Midway
Hiroshima; Nagasaki
In both the European and Pacific Theaters, a growing desire to increase national power and expand territory contributed to the start of World War II. In Europe, Germany ignored the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, expanding its military and invading other nations. In the Pacific, Japan sought to control more territory, leading to the invasion of China and, eventually, to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
While the Nazi military strategy of blitzkrieg was wildly successful in most of Europe, it failed in both Britain and the Soviet Union. As an island nation, Britain was safe from land attacks and managed to withstand and resist Nazi air assaults. In the Soviet Union, a combination of brutal winters and a willingness to sacrifice Soviet lives combined to defeat the Nazi army.
Answers will vary. On the one hand, students may argue that the bomb was justifiable to end further loss of lives. By dropping a bomb that was so devastating, it showed that the United States and the Allies were willing to annihilate their enemies—forcing them to either be destroyed completely or surrender. Along with this reasoning, students might point to the Potsdam Declaration argue that the Japanese were warned. On the other hand, students may argue that they were not justifiable—that the targeting of civilians is not ethical and that no act of military aggression should be a reason to kill hundreds of thousands of individuals and destroy lands and ecosystems. Along with this reasoning, students might claim that no one nation or person has the right to wield such total power.
Explanation:
PENN
Perceptions of interest groups and lobbyists vary, with some viewing them as vital for democratic processes and others associating them with financial influence and potential corruption. Despite regulations in place to prevent abuses, debates continue about their effectiveness.
Perceptions of interest groups and lobbyists have evolved over time and vary between individuals. Some people see interest groups as essential components of the democratic process, providing avenues for political participation and policy development. These groups serve to voice specific interests, often highly knowledgeable in their policy domains, and can provide lawmakers with technical information and perspectives that may shape policy decisions. Interest groups and lobbyists can influence policies through contributions to political campaigns and target not only lawmakers but also the executive and judiciary branches.
Despite these positive aspects, some view interest groups and lobbyists with suspicion, partly tied to the associations of monetary influence in policy-making processes. The concern generally lies in the potential for these groups to wield greater influence due to their financial capacities, thus creating an unlevel playing field. This perception has been fueled by high-profile cases of lobbying abuses and growing awareness of the power that some interest groups wield in politics.
To ensure a fair and democratic process, regulations have been put in place to control the activities of interest groups and lobbyists. Yet, the effectiveness of these regulations is a subject of constant debate. While some find them effective, others believe they require further refinement. Amid these debates, the importance of transparency and ethical standards is universally recognized.
#SPJ12
The city was controlled by a few wealthy families.
The city was difficult to defend from attacks.
The city was poor and relied on farming and fishing.
The best description of Constantinople during the reign of Constantine is the city was a center for culture because of trade. The correct option is (A).
The previous name for Istanbul, which served as Turkey's capital until 1923: The defending forces sailed to Constantinople to flee the city. Byzantium was the name of the Eastern Christian empire, which had its capital in Constantinople.
For the Ottoman Empire to grow, Constantinople was crucial. The Ottoman Empire became the most powerful in all of South Eastern Europe after the Ottoman Turks conquered the city, which served as a symbol of the rise of Islam and the decline of the heart of Christianity. It also signaled the end of the Eastern Roman Empire.
Therefore, the best description of Constantinople during the reign of Constantine is the city was a center for culture because of trade.
To know more about the Constantinople, visit:
#SPJ2
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Responses
National Security
Spread Democracy
Economic Growth
Human Rights
The foreign policy goal that the responding international agency, NAFTA, is trying to achieve is economic growth.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was an agreement signed by the United States, Canada, and Mexico in 1994 creating a free trade market between the three countries. It eliminated tariffs on most goods traded between the countries and facilitated investment in each other’s markets.
NAFTA is attempting to promote free trade between Mexico, the United States, and Canada by reducing or eliminating tariffs on goods traded among the countries. The goal is to boost economic growth and global prosperity in the region by increasing the ability of each country to trade goods with the others without being hindered by tariffs.
By doing so, NAFTA hopes to create more opportunities for businesses and consumers, as well as to increase the amount of goods and services available to them. This will help to create jobs and increase wages, leading to higher standards of living for the citizens of all three countries. Additionally, it will allow for more efficient and productive use of resources, as well as encouraging international cooperation and collaboration. This can ultimately lead to greater economic stability and prosperity in the region.
For more questions related to NAFTA
#SPJ1