If these are the choices. The answer is B
anagnorisis
catastrophe
peripeteia
hubris
1 travel
2 would travel
3 would travelled
Among the options given, the one that best completes the sentence "If I had a lot of money, I ... around the world" is:
2. would travel
This question requires knowledge about the second conditional.
If + simple past + would / could / might + main verb
With the information above in mind, we can choose number 2 to complete the sentence: If I had a lot of money, I would travel around the world.
Learn more about the second conditional here:
Answer:
2 would travel around the world .
Answer:"chemicals"
-and-
"disease"
-and-
"obesity"
Explanation:Negative connotation refers to a bad feeling that we experience when we hear a certain word or phrase .
Provided that this writer wants people to actual dislike and dissociate themselves from conventional grown foods these words adds to that as they will give people a bad feeling about such foods.
Answer:
2,3,4
Explanation:
edg
The correct answer is "whoever" in this sentence. The pronoun "whoever" is used as a subject pronoun since it it referring to the person or thing performing the action.
The options "whom" and "whomever" are not correct since they are "object pronouns" and not subject pronouns.
As regards option "who" it is also incorrect since it is used to introduce questions "Who is coming to work today?" or when referring to someone mentioned on the sentence before "The man who is dressed in red is my father". In the last sentence, the pronoun"who" is referring to "the man".