Drama is a specific literary genre that includes dialogue and a performance as part of his compositional body. This kind of text could be presented in verse or prose and it is usually thought to be performed in scenery. Also a drama, as other narrations, use to have an introduction, a conflictive moment and finally an end. The person who writes drama is called playwright or dramatist.
Through times, it has been many different types of dramatic compositions, among them we can find, for example:
These three examples are analysed by Aristotle in his book: the poetic (IV Century B.C), where he reflex about the aesthetic features of each kind of composition. The part about comedy is missed, so we only have his notes about tragedy and epic dramatizations.
Like other human being expressions, the way that the authors think a dramatic play obeys to the contextual situation; that is: how is the cultural environment thinking and, in general, living. That is why it could be harder for an actual reader (or spectator) to understand the terms, actions and beliefs of a really old play; nevertheless, we can learn many things about the past only by consulting literature (which includes dramatic texts). Of course we can feel us closer than younger representations and this is because we share more stuff with those people who lived in the times when the piece was made, but although it does affect how I understand and enjoy determinate play, I’m convinced of we can research and learn about historic process and changes to enjoy every kind of theatrical expressions.
Specifically, when we talk about how does the era affect our ability as spectators to enjoy or understand a play, we have to consider the fact that all the plays that have been made until now had some historical, social and ideological signs that we can find if we analyze them carefully. At this respect, there are many things that we cannot understand, between this kind of stuff we can find: popular lexicon, references to places, people or events that possibly marked the society and etcetera. Nevertheless, we can enjoy and understand them from the distance if we consider that they, over time, become a testimony of how life was at that moment. This means that yes, it changes the spectators' ability and way to enjoy a theatric piece, but the written era doesn’t impede the possibility of enjoying or understand it.
The differences are sometimes obvious, for example when we think in language (the kind of words and speech’s structures used), costumes or places, but it exists other aspects from societies that we cannot identify as easy as the other ones; at this respect there is the ideology (which is the way of thinking that a specific society has) who in fact influences many other human being areas: for example what is considered as good or bad, what is thinking as a mysterious or divine entities, what is seen as a relevant and important theme, etcetera. Thus, the way as we feel identified with the more recent plays (for example the Shakespeare’s ones) cannot be compared with that pieces that have millennials of age because we have change cultural and physically, hindering us the ability of feel and put ourselves in the other scenery.
KEY WORDS: Drama, culture situation, time
cerebration
B.
capitulation
C.
indenture
D.
effrontery
What is the most likely meaning of the term "Elysian fields" when used figuratively?
a stretch of green lawn
a state of perfect satisfaction
a problematic situation
an intellectual discussion
Answer:
a state of perfect satisfaction
Explanation:
The Champs Elysees represented the destination of the blessed, it was paradise according to Greek mythology. In this case the Champs Elysees were located in the far west, a wonderful land that never rained, never snowed, neither cold nor hot, was a place of extreme peace and prosperity, where there was no concern. Since the Elysian fields were a place of fullness, it can be said that when used figuratively, these fields represent a state of perfect satisfaction.
To change the given sentence into an interrogative sentence, invert the subject and the auxiliary verb.
To change the given sentence into an interrogative sentence, you need to invert the subject and the auxiliary verb. In this case, the subject is 'Nobody' and the auxiliary verb is 'likes'. The interrogative form would be: 'Does nobody like Jay?' Here, the auxiliary verb 'does' is placed before the subject 'nobody'.
#SPJ1
Answer: I would contend that this statement is actually TRUE.
Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that this action takes place in Book 2, in which Telemachus prepares for his voyage. Telemachus is talking to a group of Achaeans, and one of them, Antinous, blames his mother Penelope for deceiving the suitors and requests him to force her to marry one of them. Telemachus rejects this idea, and, pleading the immortal gods, warns the Achaeans that one day they will die in his house. Immediately thereafter Zeus replies by sending out the two eagles, who fly over the crowd and beat their wings with "destruction in their eyes," and an old warrior named Halitherses makes the prophecy that Odysseus is on his way and plans a "disastrous fate" for the suitors.
Answer:
future schools should use more technology and take less time to learn stuff and be more helpful.
Explanation:
Answer:
yes
Explanation: