The idea of "government by the people, for the people" is known as democracy.
It is a system of government where the power lies with the citizens and their elected representatives, rather than being concentrated in the hands of a single ruler or ruling elite. In a democracy, the people are free to express their opinions, vote for their leaders, and hold their leaders accountable for their actions.
The principle of democracy is based on the belief that every citizen has the right to participate in the decision-making process that affects their lives. It also ensures that the government is accountable to the people, and that the interests of the majority are protected.
Democracy promotes the idea of equality and fairness, where every citizen has an equal opportunity to participate in the political process. It ensures that the voices of all citizens are heard, regardless of their social status, economic background, or political affiliation.
The concept of democracy is not only limited to political institutions, but also extends to social, economic, and cultural spheres of life. It promotes the idea of freedom and human rights, where every individual has the right to express their thoughts, beliefs, and opinions without fear of persecution.
In conclusion, the idea of "government by the people, for the people" is the foundation of democracy, and it reflects the values of equality, fairness, and freedom. It is a system of government that empowers the citizens and ensures that their voices are heard and their interests are protected.
To learn more about democracy here:
#SPJ11
(b) Felix the Cat
(c) Betty Boop
(d) Superman
Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901, keeping rural districts in power. Baker versus Carr was a case in 1962. It was a landmark case in which the US Supreme Court decided that redistricting is justiciable question and federal court has the authority to intervene.
Further Explanation:
Baker versus Carr was a case in 1962. It was a landmark case in which the US Supreme Court decided that redistricting is a justiciable question and the federal court has the authority to intervene. The Supreme Court can hear redistricting cases. The defendants argued that restricting is a political question and federal courts have no right or authority to hear and resolve the cases.
The case arose against the state of Tennessee. It had not conducted the redistricting process since 1901. In the majority opinion held by five other justices gave the decision that the redistricting does not pass the test of a political question. The case did not impact electoral districts immediately. It sets an important power of the courts to address the question of redistricting.
There are six factors that defined any question as political. Issues like executive powers, foreign affairs on matters of political questions.
The case forced the state legislature of Tennessee is to reapportion itself based on its population. Each vote would carry equal weight. The state violated the equal protection clause.
Learn more:
1. How were the governments of Japan and Italy similar in the 1930s? check all that apply.
2. Storage containers for sensitive data must be approved by what government agency?
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Subject: Political Science
Topic: United State Judiciary
Keywords: not conducted, redistricting, electoral districts, executive powers, equal protection clause.