There was a conflict of religion versus science at theScopes Trial because the teaching of evolution where man was said to come fromanimals was against the Biblical origin of man. At the time, it was not allowedto teach that theory. This began adebate of whether or not to teach evolution in high school and it challenged the Christian origins ofman.
The Scopes Trial of 1925 showcased the clash between religion and science in early 20th-century America. The trial arose from a violation of Tennessee's Butler Act which forbade teaching evolution, pitting rural traditionalists against progressive urbanites. This tension illustrated a broader national conflict between religious fundamentalism and scientific modernism.
The Scopes Trial, also known as the Monkey Trial, occurred in 1925 and highlighted the conflict between science and religion in that era. The trial revolved around John Scopes, a high school substitute teacher who was accused of teaching evolution in violation of Tennessee's Butler Act. This Act forbade the teaching of any theory that denied the biblical story of Creation.
The legal teams represented the clash of two worldviews. William Jennings Bryan, a fundamentalist Christian who believed in a literal interpretation of the Bible, argued for the prosecution. The defence was headed by Clarence Darrow, a known agnostic and advocate for modernism and scientific discovery. Darrow's questioning of Bryan was designed to undermine the rigid literal interpretation of the Bible and promote a receptive approach towards scientific theories.
This high-profile trial landed on national headlines, with its detailed coverage revealing a deep chasm in American society; it showed a divide between the more liberal, progressive urban population who embraced scientific advancement, and the rural population who clung to traditional Christian beliefs. The Scopes Trial brought to the forefront the inevitable clash between science and religion when scientific discoveries challenge longstanding religious beliefs.
#SPJ11
b. interviews
c. objective tests
d. projective tests
Answer:a, observations
Explanation:
They believe that people are changed by their surrounding environment and to see if there are any changes one has to observe their behaviours.
Behaviorists prefer assessment through option A) observation because it aligns with their focus on measurable behaviors. This preference stands in contrast to using self-report inventories or projective tests that explore internal thoughts and feelings which are less observable.
To assess personality, behaviorists prefer option A) observation. Behaviorists focus on observable and measurable behaviors rather than internal thoughts and feelings. When assessing personalities, behaviorists often employ observational techniques because they are direct methods of assessing how individuals interact with their environment.
While there are various tools to evaluate personality, such as the self-report inventory, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), these are not typically used by behaviorists. On the other hand, projective tests like the Rorschach Inkblot Test or the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) assess unconscious processes and are also not primary methods used by behaviorists who prefer clear, observable data.
In terms of research techniques, someone like a symbolic interactionist would likely use participant observation, whereas a personality psychologist may be interested in employing various methods, such as personality assessments, to determine the best employee fit for a job.
#SPJ3
True True True Trueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
now i hope u had a great spring break :)
Answer:
Erving Goffman coined the term Saving Face.
Explanation:
Goffman believed individuals life their daily life as a play, carrying out acts, putting on masks, using a space as a stage, etc.
The term saving face is when an individual uses various strategies because he/she wants to avoid embarrassing or awkward situations in order to keep his/her reputation intact and not hurt it. He/she rescues his/her performance in front of others.
b. Have needs that are qualitatively different from those of younger children
c. require
a. True
b. False