ENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL

Who on earth would have come dressed up as the Statue of Liberty?How is the form of who or whom used in the sentence?
subject
direct object
object of a preposition
possessive

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The correct answer is subject.

The pronoun who is used as the subject of a sentence, whereas whom is used as the object (so you can eliminate direct object and object of a preposition immediately). Possessive form of who is whose, so that is incorrect as well. We are left with the subject - which is the correct answer.

The pronoun who is the doer of the action - you can change the pronoun and use a name (Sarah, for example) if it makes it easier for you to determine that it is indeed a subject.
Answer 2
Answer: The pronoun who in this sentence is used as a subject of the sentence, the doer of the action.

Related Questions

The first interaction between Kumalo and Arthur Jarvis’s son leads to..? a. milk being sent to Ndotsheni by James Jarvis for the small children of the village.b. James Jarvis realizing that Kumalo is the same man whom he met in Johannesburg.c. Kumalo’s decision to ask James Jarvis to build a dam above Ndotsheni.d. the chief telling Kumalo that he will take up the priest’s concerns with the magistrate
An author wants to show that a character is maturing into a wise and successful person. What setting would be appropriate to symbolize this change?A tree with leaves turning orange, yellow, and brown A beach on a hot, sunny day A traffic jam on a highway A bench in a busy park
When writing a news article, where should all the basic questions about the event be answered?a. in the headline of the articleb. in the first paragraph onlyc. in the second and third paragraphsd. in the concluding paragraph
Which sentence does not contain any punctuation errors?A.There are other ways to have fun you could go to the park. B.There are other ways to have fun; you could go to the park. C.There are other ways to have fun. you could go to the park. D.There are other ways to have fun, you could go to the park.
Which text from the short story “Ambush” by Tim O’Brien exemplifies the theme of soldiers’ reticence, or inability, to discuss their experiences at war?

Addressing something in a poem is using _____.a. apostrophe
b. metonymy
c. metaphor
d. simile

Answers

Answer:

Apostrophe

Explanation:

The apostrophe is a figure of speech easier to identify, since it is revealed through the vocative, that is, it is the figure of the call, of the invocation. The apostrophe can appear in several types of text, including in poems, but the identification of its classification as a figure of language is the same, regardless of the type of text.
Addressing something in a poem is using APOSTROPHE

Legendary jazz drummer Joe Morello was vision impaired however, he had a talent for hearing and feeling rhythm.What is wrong with the sentence?


A. A semicolon should precede the conjunctive adverb.
B. A semicolon should precede the coordinate conjunction.
C. A comma should precede the coordinate conjunction.
D. A comma should precede the conjunctive adverb.

Answers

The answer to your question would be that the problem with the sentence above is the following one: A semicolon should precede the conjunctive adverb. That is, the correct option would be A.

You should use a semicolon when you have a conjunctive adverb linking two independent clauses. In this case, the conjunctive adverb linking the two clauses is however. Consequently, the sentence would be as follows: Legendary jazz drummer Joe Morello was vision impaired; however, he had a talent for hearing and feeling rhythm.

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: B. A semicolon should precede the coordinate conjunction. Legendary jazz drummer Joe Morello was vision impaired; however, he had a talent for hearing and feeling rhythm.

People who have Alzheimer's disease experience an increasing loss of brain function and cognition over time. Alzheimer's is characterized by a buildup of abnormal protein fragments that damage brain cells. Recently scientists have discovered an enzyme, BACE2, that decreases these abnormal protein fragments in the brain of a person with Alzheimer's disease. Which statement explains how BACE2 most likely works?BACE2 speeds up the reaction that breaks down the abnormal protein fragments.


BACE2 is a reactant that combines with the abnormal protein fragments.


BACE2 breaks down into smaller pieces that react with the abnormal protein fragments, forming more complex molecules.


BACE2 molecules link several abnormal protein fragments together, forming a complete protein.

Answers

Answer:

BACE2 speeds up the reaction that breaks down the abnormal protein fragments.

Explanation:

BACE2 accelerates the reaction that breaks the fragments of abnormal proteins that cause Alzheimer's disease. With that, this enzyme is able to quickly cut these proteins, called beta-amyloid, into pieces so tiny that it takes the entire molecule to complete destruction. This is very innovative for the treatment of alzheimer's, although much research needs to be done to improve this process and not cause side effects.

Kyle made brownies and a cake. He cut the brownies into 6 equal parts and the cake into 8 equal parts. His family ate 3/4 of the cake. If his family ate more cake than brownies, what fraction of the brownies could have been eaten?

Answers

The fraction of the brownies could have been eaten is up to 2/3 of the brownies.

What is the process of calculating fraction of brownie?

We want to know how many brownmies did Fred and his family eat together. We will call to the total of the brownies by 1. On this case, after Fred ate 1/3 of the brownies, he will have This means that he has left 2/3 of the brownies. After his family ate 1/6 of the brownies. This means they will have left 1/2 of the tray of brownies, and that they ate half of it.

Kyle made brownies and a cake. He cut the brownies into 6 equal parts and the cake into 8 equal parts. His family ate 3/4 of the cake. If his family ate more cake than brownies, 2/3 fraction of the brownies could have been eaten.

They ate more portion of the marble cake. We can conclude that by calculating the percentage of each cake eaten by the family.Percentage can be defined as a number or ratio expressed in fraction of 100. The percentage is denoted using % sign.Total pieces of chocolate cake are 12. The family ate 5 pieces. Therefore the percentage of chocolate cake eaten will be 41.67%.

Therefore, The fraction of the brownies could have been eaten is up to 2/3 of the brownies.

Learn more about fraction on:

brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ5
up to 2/3 of the brownies.

The purpose set forth in the Constitution’s preamble is _____.to gain public support

criticize England

form a better society

break into separate states

Answers

I would go with C it seems the most correct!

Hope this helps :D

It's definitely C............

Which of these phrases uses the most formal diction?A. I thought the cold would do me in.
B. You'd think the cold would have killed me.
C. It was so cold.
D. I must have perished with cold

Answers

The phrases that use the formal diction most is, I must have perished with cold.

What is diction?

Diction is the use of words to express in speech or writing.

Because the formal diction means use of words that follows a grammatical rules without using the slangs, it is a type of language use in professional speech or writing.

Hence the correct option is, D. I must have perished with cold

To know more about diction:

brainly.com/question/2235322

#SPJ2

Yes the answer is d ....i must have perished with cold


Other Questions
Who is present when Romeo and Juliet get married??
When using direct quotations in your writing, which of the following should be placed outside the set of quotation marks?A. Question markB. PeriodC. SemicolonD. Comma
What are the personal pronouns in this sentence? Why don't you, she, and Lisa stay in my room instead?a. myb. andc. youd. ine. she
Can someone please check my essay to see if it is good? Should Americans Have the Right to Freedom of Speech? The right to free speech is one of the most cherished rights any civilian could have in the United States. But it was not until 1791 when freedom of speech was established in the First Amendment in the United States Constitution. There were many cases in the past involving individuals being punished for speaking their minds before the First Amendment was made. People in America do not necessarily have the right to free speech due to laws banning certain things we say that the government does not like to hear. Furthermore, Americans should have the right to speak freely to show their different points of view on things because everyone is an individual with a mind of their own. One of the reasons freedom of speech is important is that it gives the rights of individuals to express how they feel. When there is an issue, people should have the right to protest about an issue that needs to be addressed. People should peacefully protest to get their point across about what is wrong and persuade people to help try to solve the problem. Others may say that speaking out does nothing to change problems, but I argue that most times it does change problems. For example, people protested to have same-sex marriage to be legalized in all of U.S. On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court made the decision to legalize same-sex marriage. This was made possible through freedom of speech and can benefit a very important part of our constitution. Because of freedom being important, people in history changed our country for the better. For example, the historic “I Have a Dream Speech” that touched the lives of so many people. Because of having free speech, Martin Luther King was able to have a peaceful protest for Civil rights. His peaceful protest lead to ending segregation and leaving a positive change in the world. Freedom of speech gives the rights of individuals to show their views on issues that matter to them and being able to protest peacefully to make a change. Secondly, being able to speak your mind makes you a unique individual and at the same time, you may find others who share the same views as you. In Cuba they do not have the right to free speech. This article states, “Freedoms we take for granted every day – opening a newspaper that isn’t censored by the government or listening to a radio channel that has the freedom to play whatever songs it chooses – are not enjoyed by the Cuban people” (Cuban Freedom of Speech Freedom of Speech for Cubans, 2014). This is explaining how Cubans in their everyday lives do not even get a chance to read a newspaper without the government’s control and censorship. People need to contribute to using free speech wisely. Oftentimes, people take their rights to free speech for granted or use it for the wrong reasons. Cuba’s government think it is right to take their free speech away so everyone will not have any negative views on the government. This is not right because everyone should get a chance to speak out, even if it is something you may not agree with. It does not give the right for Cuba’s government to silence their opinions because they did not like what they would hear.