How did the ottoman empire expand their empire? What technology and methods did they use?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The Ottomans expanded through conquest. They used bows and spears, the Ottoman Empire is known for its archers. They used a tax system to keep their empire under wraps. 

Related Questions

What happened as part of the Columbian Exchange?A .Horses and cattle went from the Americas to Africa.B.Millions of Europeans died of a plague.C.Potatoes and tomatoes were introduced in Europe.D. People from Asia traveled to the Americas.
PLS HURRY!!!!! Which of the following statements best describes food production in the Middle East today?A. Most countries produce more food than they need.B. Most countries produce just enough food for their populations.C. Most countries have trouble producing enough food for their people, and must import foodfrom other countries.
The author says that when dogs and monkeys are given the same test. "Monkeys wipe the floor with dogs on this test what dose it mean
Anyone know the answer to this??
How would you characterize relations between president clinton and congress?

Where do state governments get their
powers from in the constitution?

Answers

Answer:

In the Tenth Amendment, the Constitution recognizes the powers of the state governments

ExplanatioIn

The Declaratory Act of 1766 stated _______________________. a.

that colonists were to trade only with England


b.

that there would be a tax on sugar, rum, and molasses


c.

that Parliament could make decisions concerning the colonies without conferring with colonists before passing laws


d.

the colonists intention to be independent from England

Answers

The answer is (C).
-The parliament could make decisions....
I believe the answer is B! Hope this helps. :)

Explain the argument that led to the three-fifths rule and the consequences of that rule.

Answers

The three-fifths rule was a rule that was created to solve the problem of representation in the US Congress. With this rule, slaves were considered 3/5 of a person for purposes of representation and direct taxation.

The main arguments that led to this rule was that Southern slaveholders wanted slaves to count for the purposes of representation, because then the Southern states would be considered more populated and it would cause a bigger representation of their interests in Congress. But Northern states feared that this would give southerners too much power.

The main consequence of that rule was that with it Southern States held the balance of political power.

What are 2 of the states with extensive native America reservations

Answers

Answer:

Texas and North Carolina

Explanation:

Over the years more and more land from the Native Americans was taken from them. Many crimes and wars and other forms of oppression were needed for that to happen. The land that they owned got smaller and smaller. They were then forced to live on the reservations that also got taken bit by bit and now they have very little land when compared to 100 or so years ago.

Think-Pair-Share: What do you think would have happened if Roger Sherman hadn't proposed the Great Compromise at theConstitutional Convention?

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

Roger Sherman and the Connecticut Compromise

Roger Sherman In Article VI of the Constitution of the United States, the framers declared, "This Constitution... to be the supreme Law of the Land." Constitutional authority, Laurence Tribe, notes in his book, American Constitutional Law, that "the Constitution is an endlessly intriguing object of study, and represents the best effort of its kind in the history of the world." Among the men who created the Constitution in Philadelphia during the summer of 1787, Roger Sherman, a Superior Court Judge, is remembered as the architect of the Connecticut Compromise.

When the Constitutional Convention became deadlocked over the matter of legislative voting, Sherman proposed a system similar to one he had advocated previously as a delegate to the Continental Congress in 1776. The compromise provided for representation in the House of Representatives according to population and in the Senate by equal numbers for each state. Sherman's compromise was adopted on July 16, 1787 by a vote of five states to four, and served not only to save the crumbling convention, but provided stimulus to resolve other issues yet to be decided.

Following ratification of the Constitution, Sherman served first in the House of Representatives and then in the Senate. He died while still a Senator in 1793, and is buried in the Grove Street Cemetery in New Haven, Connecticut.

Sherman was the only person to sign all four documents of the American Revolution: the Continental Association of 1774, the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the United States.

Final answer:

The absence of the Great Compromise proposed by Roger Sherman could have resulted in a deadlock at the Constitutional Convention, possibly leading to a weakened or fragmented union, and altering the structure of the U.S. government.

Explanation:

Had Roger Sherman not proposed the Great Compromise, the structure of the United States government could have been significantly different. Without this compromise, there may have been a stalemate between the larger and smaller states during the Constitutional Convention, as they were divided by the Virginia Plan favoring proportional representation and the New Jersey Plan advocating for equal representation regardless of state size. This deadlock could have jeopardized the formation of a unified national government, potentially leading to a continuation of the weak confederation established under the Articles of Confederation or even a fragmentation of the union. Ultimately, the Great Compromise allowed for a bicameral legislature with a House of Representatives based on population and a Senate with equal representation for all states, creating balance and satisfying both large and small states.

What was the impact of the US Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v Arizona (1966)?O Police were required to have a search warrant to search a suspect's dwelling.
O Minors were given the same "due process" rights as adults
O Suspects had to be told of their right to have an attorney present or to remain silent during police interrogations.
O Defendants accused of serious crimes had to be provided with a state-sponsored public defender
mmm

Answers

Answer:

C/the third one

Explanation:

Suspects had to be told of their right to have an attorney present or to remain silent during police interrogations.