A. 3.
B. 1. and 2.
C. 1.
D. 2.
The correct option is A. He arrived at Knights Park. Since it was raining the park was empty. This was perfect for Brian, he did not want anyone else to know about the treasure there should be a paragraph break in the following text.
One line of space or an indentation or both separating one paragraph from the next in the body of the text is known as a paragraph break. A par break is another name for it.
Brian did not know what to do. He could just go to work, ignore what he found and go about his day. But the more he looked at the treasure map, the more he wanted to follow it. He knew where Knights Park was, and the temptation of treasure was a lot to turn down. As his boss called his cell phone to ask where he was, Brian made his choice.
He arrived at Knights Park. Since it was raining the park was empty. This was perfect for Brian, he did not want anyone else to know about the treasure.
Learn more about Paragraph Breaking here:
#SPJ2
b: singular possessive
c: singular
d: plural
the Answer would be D) Plural
B. personal observation
C. bandwagon appeal
D. direct comparison
E. pathos
Answer:
A, B, D
Explanation:
A, B, D
Gladwell uses expert opinion, personal observation, and pathos to support his argument.
Gladwell uses several methods to support his argument:
#SPJ3
Answer: Lord Byron - His work reflected in his cynicism
Explanation: got it right on ODY
Judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion by the fact that the dissent uses cases with similar conclusions as support and the correct option is option D.
In judicial reviews, both the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion analyze and interpret the law to determine the constitutionality or legality of a particular issue. However, they often arrive at different conclusions.
In the majority opinion, the justices who form the majority provide the legal reasoning and rationale for their decision. They typically rely on legal principles, precedents, constitutional interpretation, and sometimes public policy considerations to support their conclusions. The majority opinion sets the legal precedent for future cases.
On the other hand, in the dissenting opinion, justices who disagree with the majority decision present their own analysis and reasoning. The dissenting justices may use cases with similar conclusions to argue against the majority's interpretation of the law. They may highlight inconsistencies in the majority's reasoning or provide alternative interpretations of the law.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about Judicial reviews, here:
#SPJ5