What was the Teapot Dome Scandal?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The teapot dome scandal was a scandal between the Secretary of the Interior Fall and Warren Harding, the Secretary of the Interior Fall persuaded Harding to give him control over national oil reserves in Elk Hills, California, and Teapot Dome, Wyoming. Fall released the oil reserves to two companies for $360,000 in bribes.
Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

The Teapot Dome Scandal was a significant political scandal in the U.S. during the 1920s, where Secretary of the Interior, Albert B. Fall leased naval oil reserves to private companies illegally and took bribes, leading to his conviction.

Explanation:

The Teapot Dome Scandal was a significant event in U.S. history that occurred in the early 1920s during the presidency of Warren Harding. The scandal involved the Secretary of the Interior, Albert B. Fall, who leased navy oil reserves located at Teapot Dome in Wyoming and two other sites in California to private oil companies without public bidding, which was a direct violation of the law. In return, Fall accepted bribes from these oil companies amounting to $300,000 in cash and bonds, as well as a herd of cattle for his ranch.

Learn more about Teapot Dome Scandal here:

brainly.com/question/937857

#SPJ11


Related Questions

Which of the following is an example of the correlation of productivity and a positive attitude? A. James likes chatting with his coworkers but is easily distracted.B. James turns down additional tasks at work because he doesn't want more responsibility.C. James accepts additional tasks at work as a way to show he can handle greater responsibility.D. James does some of his coworkers' work because he wants to be popular.
Which factor most directly affects a furniture company's supply?
What were the outcomes of the Spanish-American War? Check all that apply.Cuba lost its war for independence. The United States acquired four new territories. The United States had to give Cuba to Spain. Spain signed a treaty with the United States in Paris. The United States gained greater control in the Pacific.
How did peter the great westernize russia
What was the effect of the assembly line method of production in the automobile industry

What was NOT a cause for the financial and banking instability in the United States between 1836 and 1863?

Answers

During this time, economy was not the cause of the financial and banking instability in the United States. A bank war was going on in the US were some of the founding fathers were not fond of the idea of having banks. They think that it would only become the source of corruption. Because of the bank wars, the country suffered recession which lasted in the early 1840’s

Cuales son los territorios conquistado por los turcos

Answers

tiene que ser todos?


Best known early roman dictator of the republic was

Answers

Best known early roman dictator of the republic was  Cincinnatus.

Answer:

The answer is A.

Which groups in American society might have opposed Progressive reform? Explain.

Answers

In the late 19th and early 20th century, it was mainly big businesses and corporations that opposed Progressive reform in the United States, since the main purpose of these reforms was to regulate business and eliminate corruption. 

The Turks were defeated by Crusaders at Jerusalem becausea. they were severely outnumbered.
c. they did not have horses.
b. they suffered from the heat.
d. they could not remain united

Answers

The Turks were defeated by the Crusaders at Jerusalem because they could not remain united. The correct option among all the options that have been given in the question is option "d". The Crusaders could never have defeated the Turks if the Turks remained united. This weakness was taken advantage of by the Crusaders and so the Turks did not stand a chance of winning. 

How do correlation and causation differ?A. Causation can involve a number of different events, while correlation can only happen between two events.
B. Causation describes events happening in the past, while correlation describes events happening in the present.
C. Causation impacts events that happen around the same time, while correlation explains can impact events separated by many years.
D. Causation explains a direct connection between events, while correlation explains an indirect connection between events.

Answers

The correct answer is option D - Causation explains a direct connection between events, while correlation explains an indirect connection between events.

Causation is the relation between two simultaneous or successive events, when the first event, which is the cause, brings about the other, which is the effect. That means that one event is the result of the occurrence of the other.

Correlation, on the other hand, is a connection or link between things. But one does not necessarily bring the other.

Finally, it is important to say that correlation does not imply causation.

Causation explains a direct connection between events, while correlation explains an indirect connection between events. Hence option D is correct.

Correlation refers to a statistical relationship between two or more variables, indicating how they vary together. It describes the degree to which changes in one variable are associated with changes in another variable. However, correlation alone does not imply causation. Two variables can be correlated without one causing the other.

Causation, on the other hand, involves a cause-and-effect relationship between events. It suggests that changes in one variable directly result in changes in another variable.

Causation requires establishing a mechanism or process by which one event influences the other. It goes beyond mere statistical association and involves understanding the underlying factors and mechanisms that lead to the observed relationship. Establishing causation often requires rigorous experimental design, controlling for confounding variables, and considering temporal precedence.

Learn more about correlation and causation here

brainly.com/question/14596792

#SPJ6