Though nastier than others I'd seen, Sam took such good care of his cut that it healed well.
Though his cut was nastier than others I'd seen, Sam took such good care of it that it healed well.
Your answer would be: Mathildie is lazy and unimaginitive.
Hope helps-Aparri
Answer:
A. Patriotic. (PLATO)
Explanation:
1. in a fall from his bicycle last week
2.the team had to get a new kicker
3.and had surgery to set the leg bone
4.just before the championship game
The correct answer is 2. the team had to get a new kicker
Explanation:
In grammar, a sentence fragment mainly occurs when there are a set of words that go together but these do not express a complete idea or though or these are missing an essential element such as a subject or verb. In the case of the fragment "After Jose broke his leg" this sentence has an incomplete idea as the word "After" suggest another action following the accident of Jose but this is never expressed. Considering this, the option that corrects this sentence fragment by completing the idea is "the team had to get a new kicker" because this tells the event that occurred after Jose broke his leg and also this contains a subject and a verb which makes the whole sentence "After Jose broke his leg the team had to get a new kicker" be a complete and grammatical correct snetnece.
Kant's issue with Hume does not have to do with what Hume didn't say. Therefore, it is false.
Kant's problem with Hume stems more from the fact that Kant believes what Hume didn't say to be incorrect. Kant and Hume did not always see eye to eye, but when they did, their debates focused mostly on the nature of knowledge and reasoning.
Kant was critical of both Hume's scepticism and his notion that knowledge is restricted to what can be perceived by our senses. Kant argued that knowledge extends beyond this. Kant maintained that there is such a thing as innate knowledge and that reason plays an important part in comprehending the universe.
#SPJ11
FALSE.
Kant's issue with Hume does not have more to do with what Hume didn't say. In fact, Kant's criticism of Hume's philosophy is primarily focused on what Hume did say. Kant disagreed with Hume's skeptical approach to knowledge and causality. Hume argued that knowledge is based solely on sensory experience and that causality is merely a habit of the mind. Kant, on the other hand, believed that knowledge is a combination of sensory experience and innate concepts of the mind. He argued that causality is a necessary condition for our understanding of the world.
Kant's critique of Hume centers around these fundamental differences in their philosophies. He sought to reconcile Hume's empiricism with his own rationalism, ultimately proposing a synthetic approach to knowledge that combined both empirical observation and a priori concepts. Thus, Kant's issue with Hume is not about what Hume didn't say, but rather about the fundamental disagreements in their respective theories of knowledge and causality.
Who said that the world is divided into two class, the hunters and the huntees?
Answer:
whitney , whitney said it
Explanation: