Answer:
A and C
Explanation:
smart, virtuous men in government administration and export of silk, spices, ivory, jade, and ceramics on Silk Road are the 2 correct answers.
I just took the test and they were correct.
a. True
b. False
The branch of the federal government at which National Rifle Association submit its brief in support of super PACs, was the "Judicial". During the whole trial, Citizens United had the support of the National Rifle Association against the Federal Election Commission. This support included publicly supporting the creation of super PACs by the incorporation of the 501(c)(4).
Answering the question, the National Rifle Association submits its brief in support of super PACs in United citizens vs. Federal Election Commission to the judicial branch of the federal government.
The citizens united filed a lawsuit before Supreme Court to stop the federal law commission from preventing it from airing its documentary on Hillary Clinton. The interest group, National rifle association also supported the position of the Citizens united.
However, in 2010, the Supreme Court gave a landmark ruling in support of the citizens united and affirmed that the free speech clause of the first amendment prevents the government from restricting or limiting Independent corporations or organizations from spending on political communications.
The Supreme Court confirmed that political spending is a form of free speech and that the first amendment protected its provision
The Supreme Court decision was hailed as a win for independent cooperation, especially for organizations that have the interest to sponsor a candidate during the electioneering campaign.
The court ruling open door for nonprofit organizations, labor unions, and other large cooperation, the free will to spend money on any candidates of their choice.
Some of the section that was cited by the citizens united is section 203 of BRCA, which it claimed was in total violation of the first amendment right to free speech.
LEARN MORE:
KEYWORDS:
Both were reasons for the war between the U.S. and Mexico.
Both were actions to expand borders and U.S. influence.
Both were agreements signed between the U.S. and Spain.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Monroe Doctrine may appear to be confusing as it is a neutralist principle, yet truth be told it expanded the American impact. With this the US guaranteed to remain far from the undertakings of the European countries yet it won't endure their impedance in the undertakings of the western half of the globe and the nations there. Along these lines, with this the US extended their impact to the who side of the equator. The Adams-Otis bargain consumed the American domains as it was an arrangement by which the United States procured Florida.
Answer:
The third option
Explanation:
took the test :) Brainliest?
The answer is E: citizenship, due process, and equal protection under the law