After converting -31/8 to decimal form (-3.875), it is evident that -31/8 is greater than -3.92 as negative numbers increase in value as they approach zero. The answer is -31/8 > -3.92
To determine the answer, we first need to compare two numbers, -31/8 and -3.92. To make this easier, convert -31/8 into decimal form. -31 divided by 8 equals -3.875.
Now, comparing -3.875 (which is -31/8 in decimal form) and -3.92, we can see that -3.875 is greater, because negative numbers get larger as they approach zero, and -3.875 is closer to zero than -3.92. So the answer is: -31/8 > -3.92.
#SPJ3
Complete the sentence below. Choose the correct answer from the drop down menu.
The relationship between degrees Celsius and degrees Fahrenheit
.
Explain or show your reasoning.
Type your response or use the drawing space below.
The relationship between degrees Celsius and degrees Fahrenheit, as given by the equation F = 95C + 32, is not proportional.
The relationship between degrees Celsius and degrees Fahrenheit is not a proportional relationship.
In a proportional relationship, the ratio between the two variables remains constant. However, in the equation F = 95C + 32, the relationship between Celsius and Fahrenheit is not proportional because the coefficient of C is 95, indicating that the conversion between the two scales is not a simple multiplication or division by a constant value.
To illustrate this, consider two examples:
If we double the value of C, the equation becomes F = 95(2C) + 32 = 190C + 32. The coefficient of C changes, indicating that the relationship is not proportional.
If we set C = 0, the equation becomes F = 95(0) + 32 = 32. This shows that at 0 degrees Celsius, the Fahrenheit temperature is not zero, further demonstrating that the relationship is not proportional.
Therefore, the relationship between degrees Celsius and degrees Fahrenheit, as given by the equation F = 95C + 32, is not proportional.
Read on temperature on brainly.com/question/24746268
#SPJ3
Answer:
No, there are no proportional relationships here.
Step-by-step explanation:
I think you mean F=(*C)+32
No, there is not. There is no proportional relationship because proportional relationships require multiplication and division only, not any extra additive numbers, else it would not be proportional. Evidence: If we turned this into a graph, like so: y=(*x)+32, then the slope would not pass through zero.