Nations must acquire new territories and become world powers in order to survive.
Nations that acquire new territories will be defeated as other powers join forces against them.
Nations that acquire new territories will grow and change and eventually lose their founding principles.
I think this is B based off of:
"given justification through Social Darwinian ethics - people saw natives as being weaker and more unfit to survive, and therefore felt justified in seizing land and resources."
b. Solon
c. Leonidas
d. Aristotle
B) Solon
Hope This Helps
Answer:
D: the USSR.
Explanation: Just took the quiz
Here is information to support either side:
Federalists - Federalists were individuals who believed that the United States needed the federal government to have more power than the state government. One of the major reason behind this idea is the lack of success underneath the Articles of Confederation. This was America's first constitution and it was highly ineffective. This was ineffective due to the lack of power held by the federal government.
Anti-Federalists- Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, felt that state governments should have more power than federal government. Anti-Federalists feared that a strong federal govenrment would infringe upon the rights of its citizens.
There was a decline in the production of art.
b.
A war between the Catholics and Protestants occurred.
c.
There was a major division between Catholicism and Protestantism throughout Europe.
d.
all of the abovE
The major change following the Reformation occured in the 16th century in Europe was a major division between Catholicism and Protestantism throughout Europe. (C)
Protestantism was movement that began in northern Europe in the early 16th century in response to medieval Roman Catholic doctrines and practices. Along with Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, Protestantism turnt into one of three major forces in Christianity.