The earliest human legal systems were almost completely forms of lex talionis. That means "the law of revenge." The lex talionis is a law of equal and direct revenge. It is what it says in Hebrew scriptures: "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life." The best example of this law was Hammurabi's Code. Hammurabi was a Babylonian king. He created a series of 282 laws. Those laws were based entirely on the principle of revenge. Under this code, a person found guilty of murder was immediately stoned to death or drowned in a river. A person who assaulted another person was to have his or her hands cut off. Which statement is the best summary of this paragraph?

A.Hammurabi was a Babylonian king. He created 282 laws based on revenge. One law said a person that beat up another person had to have his or her hands cut off.

B.Hebrew scriptures say, "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life." This means the punishment should fit the crime. It is law based on revenge.

C.If a person was guilty of murder, Hammurabi's code said that he or she had to be killed by stoning or drowning. Hammurabi was the king of Babylon many years ago.

D.Lex talionis is the idea of law based on revenge. Hammurabi's Code is an example of this. The code was made up of 282 laws based on the idea of revenge.

What is the difference between expelled and suspended

What was the effect of Tolkien's decision to set The Hobbit in Middle-earth rather than a real place?The setting allowed him to write about characters who had flaws and did not always do the right thing.

The setting allowed him to give his novel a happy ending rather than a tragic one.

The setting allowed him to invent all different kinds of imaginary creatures, myths, and gods.

The setting allowed him to write about a heroic figure who goes on a quest.

The study of word origins is known as

Please answer fast CORRECTLY!!! Will give Brainliest!!!STORIES OF USEFUL INVENTIONS, excerpt
By S. E. Forman

1911

THE MATCH

There never was a time when the world was without fire, but there was a time when men did not know how to kindle fire; and after they learned how to kindle one, it was a long, long time before they learned how to kindle one easily. In these days we can kindle a fire without any trouble, because we can easily get a match; but we must remember that the match is one of the most wonderful things in the world, and that it took men thousands of years to learn how to make one. Let us learn the history of this familiar little object, the match.

Fire was first given to man by nature itself. When a forest is set on fire by cinders from a neighboring volcano, or when a tree is set ablaze by a thunderbolt, we may say that nature strikes a match. In the early history of the world, nature had to kindle all the fires, for man by his own effort was unable to produce a spark. The first method, then, of getting fire for use was to light sticks of wood at a flame kindled by nature—by a volcano, perhaps, or by a stroke of lightning. These firebrands were carried to the home and used in kindling the fires there. The fire secured in this way was carefully guarded and was kept burning as long as possible. But the flame, however faithfully watched, would sometimes be extinguished. A sudden gust of wind or a sudden shower would put it out. Then a new firebrand would have to be secured, and this often meant a long journey and a deal of trouble.

In 1827, John Walker, a druggist in a small English town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. The druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. It is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. Although Walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. It could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. In a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. The match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. It would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. This was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar.


Why does the author include details about the difficulty of getting fire before matches?
A.) By showing the importance of matches today
B.) By providing a history of how matches developed
C.) By showing how nature created fire
D.) By providing the history of John Walker’s work

Direction :Circle the pronouns and draw an arrow to the noun to which refers

An easy that end with I had better listen to my parent