analysis
reporting conclusions
making theories
classifying data
reading what others say
interpreting information
The correct answers to this question are A) analysis, B) reporting conclusions, C) making theories, and D) classifying data.
These are steps in the historical method: Analysis: to check all the sources and their availability to do the research. You have to make a general assessment of the topic at hand. Then, making theories: for what you have done in the first step, you are going to have a couple of theories to start from. This is going to give some paths to follow. Nex, classifying data: you must have parameters to decide what information is useful and what source is valid to consider it. You classify data in order of importance or chronologically. And finally, after you elaborate on your arguments, you have to report conclusions that summarizes your research and confirm or not what you wrote in your thesis statement.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Some delegates wanted Congress to choose the President, but that would have upset the balance of power among the three branches of government. Others called for direct popular vote, but that would have left the decision in the hands of ill-informed voters who knew little about politicians outside their home state.
So they created electors. And they hoped the electors would be some of brightest and best informed people who would base their decisions on the candidates' merit. (Each state gets as many electoral votes as it has members in the Senate and House.)
Hope this helped!
B.He went to the library he wanted a book.
C.Went to the library.
D.He went to the library. After he wanted a book.
A. The error is the use of 'because' in a separate sentence. The conjunction 'because' links two clauses within the same sentence. The correct sentence would be:
He went to the library because he wanted a book.
B. The error is the lack of a conjunction linking the two clauses, this is, a conjunction like 'because' is missing.
He went to the library because he wanted a book.
C, Went to the library is a case of run-on sentence because it has no subject.
The structure of this run-on sentence is: <*Subject missing> + <Main Verb> + <Preposition> + <Determiner> + <Noun/Prepositional Object>
D. The clause he went to the library expresses a consequence and he wanted a book expresses a cause, therefore the use of 'after,' expressing time, as a linking word is incorrect. Only conjunctions like 'because' or 'so' can be used in this case.
He went to the library because he wanted a book.
He wanted a book, so he went to the library.
Answer:
On June 9, 1855, the Yakama, Umatilla, Cayuse, and Walla Walla tribes were forced to cede in excess of six million acres to the United States government, partly as punishment for the killing by a group of young Cayuse of Methodist missionaries Marcus and Narcissa Whitman and others on November 29, 1847.