b. smaller
c. small
Present is to introduce as conclude is to end.
A term or phrase that in a particular language implies the same thing "as another word, morpheme, or phrase" is said to be a synonym. For instance, the words initiate, begin, commence, and start are all synonyms of one another in the English language means they are interchangeable or synonymous to each other.
The terms "present" and "introduce," as well as "conclude" and "end," are interchangeable means they can be used in each other's places and synonyms of each other means they have similar meaning. "Present" and "introduce" mean the same thing as "conclude" and "end," mean the same thing.
To introduce is to formally present someone or something. The terms "conclude" and "end" refer to bringing something to a conclusion or limit. Thus, these words "present" and "introduce," and "conclude" and "end," are synonymous to each other.
To learn more about synonyms here
#SPJ2
Recapitulate is the answer is you're on Edmentum (plato)
b. The safari stopped at an oasis, a moist, fertile spot in the desert.
c. Ed had always wanted to go on a safari.
d. Going on a safari had been Ed’s life-long dream.
Answer:
The sentence that contains an appositive phrase is sentence B.
Explanation:
An appositive phrase is a noun or noun phrase that renames another noun right beside it. Because the information provided by the appositive is nonessential as the meaning of the sentence does not depend on it, it is offset with commas. If you removed the appositive from the sentence, the meaning would be left unchanged (see 1).
1) The safari stopped at an oasis
The answer is B.) The safari stopped at an oasis, a moist fertile spot in the desert.
The appositive phrase is a moist fertile spot in the desert. You can read the rest of the sentence without that part and still have a complete sentence. It describers oasis.
Rainsford’s response to Zaroff indicates that he is opposed to the idea of hunting humans.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
"I can't believe you are serious, General Zaroff. This is a grisly joke" (emphasize added)
"Hunting? General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder" (emphasize added)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hope this helps
Hey there! :D
In the story "The Most Dangerous Game," the general is hunting down humans for sport. In response to this confession, Rainsford says that hunting down humans is murder. We can eliminate any answer choice that has a positive correlation to what the general is saying. He wouldn't join Zaroff in hunting humans if he thought it was murder. He doesn't think it's right either.
We are left with two options. One elaborates that Rainsford is opposed to hunting humans, and the other is that he does not understand why Zaroff is hunting humans. What goes along with what Rainsford's dialogue is saying more than the other? Well, Rainsford doesn't understand why the General is hunting humans. 'This is a grisly joke.' But, he clearly states that he thinks that hunting humans is considered murder. And he clearly expresses the idea that he is very opposed to it. I think the best answer choice is:
"Rainsford's response to Zaroff indicates that... he is opposed to the idea of hunting humans."
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
The 'Day of Destiny' primarily focuses on the characters Arthur Pendragon and Morgana le Fay. Their relationship and conflict drive the story.
In the book 'Day of Destiny' characters are a rich tapestry of personalities that contribute to the storyline. The primary protagonist is Arthur Pendragon, who is a mature and wise king. His primary antagonist, Morgana le Fay, is a witch with malicious intent against Arthur. Their interplay defines much of the book's conflict, offering a deep and engaging story.
#SPJ12