The main way the author reveals jade's character to readers is By describing Jade's thoughts.
To their circumstances, authors write differently and with varied viewpoints.
Indeed,t writers' attitudes toward their subject matter frequently come across in their writing, and it is the reader's responsibility to recognize the writer's attitude, understand why he or she adopts that tone, and assess how this impacts the meaning of the text.
The attitude or tone of a writer is simply how they feel about the subject they are writing about. Through word choice, phrase construction, and figurative language, writers convey their attitudes. A writer's attitude can also be shown in the details, arguments, and proof they use to support their claims.
Therefore, The main way the author reveals jade's character to readers is By describing Jade's thoughts.
To learn more about jade's refer to the link:
#SPJ5
b. sandy shore / kind of tree
c. guided / a metal
d. opens lock / harbour e) flat land / joiner's tool f) suffering / piece of glass
Muck-rake- n. A rake for scraping up muck or dung
Muckrake- v. To search out and publicly expose real or apparent misconduct of a prominent individual or business
SATURDAY, APRIL 14, 1906
In Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress you may recall the description of the Man with the Muck-rake, the man who could look no way but downward, with the muck-rake in his hand; who was offered a celestial crown for his muck-rake, but who would neither look up nor regard the crown he was offered, but continued to rake to himself the filth of the floor.
In Pilgrim's Progress the Man with the Muck-rake is set forth as the example of him whose vision is fixed on carnal instead of on spiritual things. Yet he also typifies the man who in this life consistently refuses to see aught that is lofty, and fixes his eyes with solemn intentness only on that which is vile and debasing. Now, it is very necessary that we should not flinch from seeing what is vile and debasing. There is filth on the floor and it must be scraped up with the muck-rake; and there are times and places where this service is the most needed of all the services that can be performed. But the man who never does anything else, who never thinks or speaks or writes, save of his feats with the muck-rake, speedily becomes, not a help to society, not an incitement to good, but one of the most potent forces for evil.
There are, in the body politic, economic and social, many and grave evils, and there is urgent necessity for the sternest war upon them. There should be relentless exposure of and attack upon every evil man whether politician or business man, every evil practice, whether in politics, in business, or in social life. I hail as a benefactor every writer or speaker, every man who, on the platform, or in book, magazine, or newspaper, with merciless severity makes such attack, provided always that he in his turn remembers that the attack is of use only if it is absolutely truthful. . . To assail the great and admitted evils of our political and industrial life with such crude and sweeping generalizations as to include decent men in the general condemnation means the searing of the public conscience. There results a general attitude either of cynical belief in and indifference to public corruption or else of a distrustful inability to discriminate between the good and the bad. Either attitude is fraught with untold damage to the country as a whole. The fool who has not sense to discriminate between what is good and what is bad is well-nigh as dangerous as the man who does discriminate and yet chooses the bad. There is nothing more distressing to every good patriot, to every good American, than the hard, scoffing spirit which treats the allegation of dishonesty in a public man as a cause for laughter. Such laughter is worse than the crackling of thorns under a pot, for it denotes not merely the vacant mind, but the heart in which high emotions have been choked before they could grow to fruition.
Why does Roosevelt say, in the second paragraph, "Yet he also typifies the man who in this life consistently refuses to see aught that is lofty, and fixes his eyes with solemn intentness only on that which is vile and debasing"?
Answers:
To make the audience want to read Pilgrim's Progress so they can understand his message
To make a connection between the character in Pilgrim's Progress and muckraking journalists
To make journalists and politicians seem superior to the character in Pilgrim's Progress
To show the difference between the character in Pilgrim's Progress and muckraking journalists
before the excerpt, Roosevelt says, "In Pilgrim's Progress the Man with the Muck-rake is set forth as the example of him whose vision is fixed on carnal instead of on spiritual things. Yet he also typifies the man who in this life consistently refuses to see aught that is lofty, and fixes his eyes with solemn intentness only on that which is vile and debasing." He infers that although the Pilgrim's Progress outlines the Man with the Muck-rake as correct, they are wrong to do so, and that the very message they carry is contradictory. He is NOT telling people to read the Pilgrim's Progress, which automatically eliminates answer 1. Although I could write a long essay about how the goal of this speech is to make regular politicians and journalists seem superior to muckrakers and the character in Pilgrim's Progress, they aren't mentioned in this excerpt, so you can eliminate answer 3 as well.
From there, it needs to be determined if the goal of this excerpt is to draw a connection between the character in Pilgrim's Progress to the muckrakers, or to show the difference. The key to determining this is in the first word of the quote, "yet". Roosevelt first acknowledges the upstanding moral character of the Pilgrim's Progress, and follows this statement by explaining how the muckrakers are not the same.
Therefor, the answer is number 4, "to show the difference between the character in Pilgrim's Progress and the muckraking journalists." My apologies for leaving you this essay to read XD
Answer:
The answer is "D."
Explanation:
Took da test
b. soar
c. no infinitive User: Identify the infinitive phrase in the sentence below. The name "Yellowstone" is thought to come from the Native Americans who named the area for its yellow cliffs.
a. for its yellow cliffs
c. to come from the Native Americans
b. who named the area
d. none of these
It uses logical examples and explanations to examine a topic in an organized way.
It uses poetic techniques to explore thoughts and feelings about a subject in a concise way.
It uses narrative techniques to reveal the human experience in a complex and multifaceted way.
Answer:
The correct answer would be the second one: It uses logical examples and explanations to examine a topic in an organized way.
Explanation:
An expository essay aims to explain, clarify a subject/topic to the readers. It, thus, presents arguments in a logical, organized manner after due investigation.
The other options given in the question refer to other genres, such as a novel or a poem. Such genres, unlike the expository essay, present feelings and subjectivity. The expository essay keeps a neutral tone.
I assume that the first question is related to the novel "The importance of being Ernest" by Oscar Wilde. This novel tells the story of Jack Worthing a pilar of the community in Hertfordshire and guardian of Cecil Cardew who´s grand father, Thomas Cardew, adopted Jack whe he was a baby. Jack is a model of man with his behaviour toward the community but for years he has pretended to have an irresponsable brother known by the name of Earnest who lead a scandalous life in London. Ernest is an alibi created by Jack that allows him to dissapear for some days and do whatever he likes.
He is in love of Gwendolen Fairfax, cousin of his best friend Algernon Moncrief. They both know Jack as Ernest but Algernon suspect he is carrying a double life because he had found an inscription on Ernest´s cigarette case adressed to "Uncle Jack". At the beggining of the play Jack drops in Algernon´s house to announce his intention to propose to Gwendolen and his friend confront him with the cigarette case making Jack confess. He tells his entire story about his fictional brother Ernest and assure him that he was considering to "kill" him.
When Gwendolen and her mother, Lady Bracknell, arrived Jack propose and discover that she returns his affection but she still believes that his name is Earnest and is fixated with that name because it inspired absolut confidence. Lady Bracknell interview Jack to determine if he would be a good son-in-law but when she find out that he was adopted and did not knew her parents she forbids the match between with her daughter.
Jack´s besti friend Algernon had fallen in love of Cecil after he heard the story told by Jack when he confessed and want to propose to her after Lady Bracknell interviewed her and find out she was really rich. But Jack as his ward did not allow that unless Bracknell consent him to marry with Gwendolen.
Neverthelesss Lady Bracknell refused and went to asked for permission to Cecily´s governess Miss Prism who she realized had stolen her sister´s baby 28 years before who happens to be Jack. That revelation transformed him into Gwendolen´s cousin and the older brother of his best friend Algernon and removes all obstacle between his union with Gwendolen.
For the second question I believe the correct answers are: B) They deliberately ignored the suffering of the parish children, and D) They wanted to give the impression that they were performing their work
Apparently, all the parish officials wanted was to preserve the appearance that everything was right, while keeping up with their corrupted practice of conceiving the problems and malpractice. Their duty was to make sure that the children were cared for, but they refused to do it, fully aware of the consequences.
B bartleby's death
C the woman tearing off the the wallpaper
D the narrator hiring bartleby