b. False
This statement is False. The South only had 11 million people, which is only a half compare to the 23 million people that the North had. The North had more people to work on their railroads and factories and grow much more food.
The correct answer is B, as the statement is false.
In the North the great capitalist industry was growing, with a large concentration of salaried labor, in full takeoff and at the doors of the Second Industrial Revolution (to which the war contributed, with the new military technologies such as the battleships or the production of mass weaponry). These bourgeois groups from the north were represented by the new Republican Party, of a liberal nationalist type, which sought the implementation of protectionist policies.
On the other hand, the South remained anchored in an economic system that was unfavorable to capitalist development (mechanization and hiring of workers was cheaper than the maintenance of slaves). The Democratic Party would be the defender of slavery. This party had led the great expansion of the country to the south (activism in favor of the annexation of Mexican territory) and now stood as representative of the southern elites, which sought fundamentally the extension of the slave system and free trade for the export of raw materials and the importation of manufactured goods without barriers.
B. To spread the words of hope and faith.
C. To go back home and dream for the day change will occur.
D. To teach their neighbors the words to "Free at Last".
Answer:
I hope this helps :)
Explanation:
b. the new deal created jobs and improved the nation's infrastructure.
c. the new deal did not eliminate unemployment.
d. the new deal proved that the united states had to go back to an unregulated economy.
Answer:
D. The new deal proved that the united states had to go back to an unregulated economy.
Explanation:
The New Deal was a series of measures and projects enacted during Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration that aimed at helping the U.S. economy to recover during the Great Depression and to provide relief to struggling Americans.
Under this program, the government actively participated in the nation's affairs and increased government spending to create several federal agencies to put people back to work (like the Civilian Conservation Corps and the Works Progress Administration), which helped to reduce the unemployment rates, to regulate the banking industry, to improve the nation's infrastructure, and to create laws that would benefit the most in need like the Social Security Act.
So, the New Deal achieved all options A, B and C. But option D is not a true statement, because under this program, the government indeed regulated the economy and those measures had a positive effect on the U.S. economy and American lives.
I need to say that the world situation is very serious. . . . Europe must have a great deal of additional help,
or face heavy economic, social, and political damage. This would have a harmful effect on the world at
large. There are also possibilities of disturbances because of the desperation of the people concerned.
The effect on the economy of the United States should be clear to all. So the United States should do
whatever it can to help restore normal economic health to the world. Without this there can be no
political stability or peace. Our policy is directed . . . against hunger, poverty, desperation and chaos
[disorder]. Its purpose is to revive a working economy in the world.
Why did Secretary of State Marshall suggest this plan for European recovery?______________________
Secretary of State Marshall suggested his plan to help rebuild European economies after World War as a way of staving off political instability and poverty conditions, which would become breeding grounds for governments that would go against freedom.
Explanation/context:
The "Marshall Plan" was named after the man who then was US Secretary of State, George C. Marshall. Officially the plan was called the European Recovery Program. Marshall announced the plan in 1947, and it went into effect in 1948. The intent was to provide aid and rebuilding to European economies after the damaging effects of World War II.
In his speech introducing the plan, Secretary Marshall presented the plan as aid for any and all nations, saying : "Our policy is not directed against any country, but against hunger, poverty, desperation and chaos. Any government that is willing to assist in recovery will find full co-operation on the part of the United States. Its purpose should be the revival of a working economy in the world so as to permit the emergence of political and social conditions in which free institutions can exist." [I provided more context for the quote you had shown, to see more of his intent in the remarks.]
The view in the communist-controlled Eastern bloc was that the US was trying to use such a policy to spread its influence and threaten their patterns of government under communism. So the plan ended up building allies for the US in Western Europe, while the Eastern European countries sided with the Soviet Union. So it was an example of Cold War tactics of competition between the US and the USSR, apart from the use of military force.
Answer: Let me know if this help have a nice day!
Explanation: The first institutions of higher education established in Texas came in the mid-19th century. One of the earliest was Baylor University, founded in Independence, Texas in 1845. It was the first institution of higher learning in the state and initially focused on providing education in arts and sciences. Baylor University was followed by other significant institutions, such as Southwestern University in Georgetown (1840), Austin College in Huntsville (1849), and the University of Texas at Austin (1883).
These early institutions played a crucial role in providing educational opportunities to Texans and laid the foundation for the development of higher education in the state. They offered various academic programs and contributed to the intellectual and cultural growth of Texas.
It's important to note that the establishment of these institutions was influenced by the growing population, the desire for education, and the need to train future leaders and professionals. These institutions continue to thrive today, offering a wide range of educational opportunities to students from all over Texas and beyond.