Members of military families who support a strong national defense are more likely to vote for a candidate who

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

The options of the question are, A) favors a liberal ideology. B) favors a progressive ideology. C) belongs to the Democratic Party. D) belongs to the Republican Party.

The correct answer is D) belongs to the Republican Party.

Members of military families who support a strong national defense are more likely to vote for a candidate who belongs to the Republican Party.

Military families had endured the struggles of war and know directly what is to have family members abroad, fighting in the war or they had members stationed in military zones in other countries. These members of military families support a strong national defense are more likely to vote for a candidate who belongs to the Republican Party because of its conservative approach to politics and economy.

Related Questions

Name 2 reasons The US entered the Spanish American War
After the Boston tea Party, the _________ punished Boston colonists by forcing them to house British soldiers, plus several other laws.
Why was frank palko convicted and sentenced twice in connecticut, even though the constitution promises protection from double jeopardy?
What is the Law of Supply and Demand? The less there is, the less people want. The more there is, the less people want. The more there is, the more people want. Government supplies it because people demand it. Farmers created the term to promote growth.
This patriotic hymn, also called “America,” shares its tune, ironically, with “God Save the Queen,” the British National Anthem. Name it. a. “My Country, ‘Tis of Thee” b. “America the Beautiful” c. “The Marines Hymn”

Were the Alien and Sedition Acts constitutional or unconstitutional? Did they follow the meaning of the Constitution or did they violate it in some way? Be prepared to cite the Constitution in your response.Second, what would happen if the individual states chose to nullify these acts or any others? What would it mean for the country?
Lastly, should the United States institute some form of the Alien and Sedition Acts in today's post 9/11 world? Explain your answer and by the events surrounding the Alien and Sedition Acts to today.

Answers

The Alien and Sedition Acts were four bills passed by the Congress and signed by president John Adams in 1798. These bills made it harder for an immigrant to become a citizen, they allowed the president to imprison and deport non-citizens who were deemed dangerous or were from a hostile nation and criminalized making false statements that were critical of the federal government.

Critics of these acts argued that they were an attempt to suppress voters who disagreed with the Federalist Party and that they violated the right of freedom of speech in the First Amendment.

If any individual states chose to nullify these acts, it would be consider a serious sign of rebellion. This was almost the case, with the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions.

The United States should not implement these laws as their immigration system is already extremely strict. It is very unlikely that severe threats to security are being caused by immigrants, and if they were, the US already has significant power to deal with them. All of this makes new laws unnecessary.

The Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional as it limited free speech, which is guaranteed in the first Amendment. If the individual states chose to nullify the acts, that would be a sign of rebellion. I do not think that the US should institute forms of the Alien and Sedition Act. It's America. The people here should be free to say what they want to say.

What kind of transportation was used in the 80's

Answers

There were some cars. People also used trains and busses

How did World War I change the balance of economic power in the world?

Answers

how did WW1 change the balance of economic power in the world?Only the US and Japan were in better financial share then before the war

Cracking down on dissent during World War I was part of what larger governmental goal in the US?

Answers

Cracking down on dissent during World War I was part of the larger governmental goal in the US of mobilizing the domestic economy to support the war effort.

The larger goal was uniting Americans around the war effort.

Cracking down on dissent would be a negative action in support of the larger, positive goal the government sought. The government wanted a fully united public in support of the war, and so it put out the message that that freedom of speech might have its limits in times of war.

The civilizations of the Americas

Answers

Answer:Ancient America was home to sophisticated civilizations such as the Maya, Inca, Olmec and Aztec societies, and mysterious ruins like Chichen Itza, Teotihuacan, Serpent Mound, Tikal, Machu Picchu and the Nazca Lines.

Explanation:

Answer: Civilizations in the Americas were diverse and their peoples spoke many different languages.

Explanation: PF

Which best descibes consensus historiography ?

Answers

What are your answer options

Other Questions

What was the 19th amendment?

The Brezhnev Doctrine asserted that the Soviet Union would __________.a) require Eastern European nations to collectivize their agriculture b) interfere in Eastern European nations to preserve communist rule c) seek a disarmament agreement with NATO d) reject the use of military means to spread communism in Europe

In communism, no one owns any private property. True False

1) According to the United Nations, the greatest global health issue in the world is the Malaria epidemic.True False