Which one of the following sentences contains a predicate adjective? A. I brought my lunch for the first time this year.
B. We scanned the distant shore for signs of life.
C. What does this hard lesson teach you?
D. The teacher appeared angry when Dave forgot his homework.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: D. The teacher appeared angry when Dave forgot his homework. This sentence contains a predicate adjective.

Predicate adjectives are adjectives that follow a linking verb and provide information that describes the subject of the sentence.

Subject - Teacher
Linking Verb - appeared
Predicate Adjective - angry

A predicate adjective can be a single adjective or can be a phrase that includes an adjective and any modifiers.

Related Questions

Read the sentence. I _____ my old school every summer. Use the present emphatic tense to complete the sentence. do visit visit have been visiting am visiting
Which attribute of the characters in morality plays reflects the fact that these plays were naive allegories?
Most people reject what they don’t understand because ______.a. It is too expensive to change b. It challenges their own ideas c. It must either be rejected or it must be accepted d. It is humiliating to try to understand something
The _________ a star appears to move, the farther it is from earth.a. More b. Less c. Faster d. Slower
You are in charge of the quality of the toys a factory produces for a company called Neo. Which task best describes what you should do to check adherence to the company's quality standards?

Raw celery has a slight sparkle, a zingy taste that you don't get in cooked celery. When Mrs. Gleason came around with the relish tray, we each took another stalk of celery, except my brother. He took two. —"The All-American Slurp," Lensey Namioka What does the word stalk mean in this sentence?

Answers

Answer:

A stalk or bunch of celery refers to a number of branches or ribs with a central heart. Americans use the word stalk to refer to a single branch or rib, when the word stalk really means a bunch of celery.

:

Answer: (D) = Piece of a plant

Explanation:

Write an essay in which you explain how Peter S. Goodman builds anargument to persuade his audience that news organizations should increase
the amount of professional foreign news coverage provided to Americans. In
your essay, analyze how Goodman uses one or more of the features listed in
the box above (or features of your own choice) to strengthen the logic and
persuasiveness of his argument. Be sure that your analysis focuses on the most
relevant features of the passage.

Answers

Answer: In the article “Foreign News at a Crisis Point,” Peter S. Goodman eloquently argues the ‘point’ that news organizations should increase the amount of professional foreign news coverage provided to people in the United States. Goodman builds his argument by using facts and evidence, addressing the counterarguments, and couching it all in persuasive and compelling language.

Goodman begins the article by bombarding the reader with facts and statistics. He states that, according to a census conducted by the American Journalism Review, the number of full-time foreign news correspondents in the United States dropped from 307 in 2003 to 234 in 2011. In addition, the AJR survey also discovered that “the space devoted to foreign news [in American papers] had shrunk by 53 percent” in the last 25 years.

Beginning the article with all of these facts and figures has a couple of strengthening effects on Goodman’s argument. First, by starting out with hard evidence, Goodman lays the groundwork of his own credibility. He’s not just writing an opinion piece – his opinion is backed by the truth. This will bring the readers onboard and make them more likely to trust everything else he says. Second, because Goodman presents these facts without much explaining/interpreting, the reader is forced to do the math herself. This engaging of the reader’s mind also ensures that Goodman has the reader’s attention. When the reader does the math to find a drop of 73 full-time foreign news correspondents employed by US papers in just 8 short years, she will find herself predisposed to agree with Goodman’s call for more professional foreign news reporting.

In addition to employing facts to his argument’s advantage, Goodman also cunningly discusses the counterargument to his position. By writing about how social media and man-on-the-ground reporting has had some positive impact on the state of foreign news reporting, Goodman heads off naysayers at the pass. It would have been very easy for Goodman to elide over the whole issue of citizen reporting, but the resultant one-sided argument would have been much less convincing. Instead, Goodman acknowledges things like “the force of social media during the Arab Spring, as activists convened and reacted to changing circumstances.” As a result, when he partially refutes this counterargument, stating the “unease” many longtime profession correspondents feel over the trend of ‘citizen journalism’ feel, the reader is much more likely to believe him. After all, Goodman acknowledges that social media does have some power. Knowing that Goodman takes the power of social media seriously will make the reader more inclined, in turn, to take Goodman’s concern about the limits of social media seriously.

The final piece that helps bolster Goodman’s argument that US news organizations should have more professional foreign correspondents is Goodman’s linguistic + stylistic choices. Goodman uses contrasts to draw the reader deeper into his mindset. By setting up the contrast between professional reporters as “informational filters” that discriminate good from bad and amateur, man-on-the-spot reporters as undiscriminating “funnels,” Goodman forces the reader to view the two in opposition and admit that professional filters are to be preferred over funnels that add “speculation, propaganda, and other white noise” to their reporting. In addition, Goodman drives the reader along toward agreeing with his conclusion in the penultimate paragraph of the article with the repetition of the phrase “We need.” With every repetition, Goodman hammers even further home the inescapable rightness of his argument. The use of “We” more generally through the article serves to make the readers feel sympathetic towards Goodman and identify with him.

By employing the rhetorical techniques of presenting facts, acknowledging the other side, and using persuasive language, Goodman convinces the reader of his claim.

Which of the following reflects a tone appropriate for an audience that includes readers who disagree with your position? a. Language that creates an antagonistic tone and does not allow for contrasting views
b. Language that dismisses those who have opinions different from your positions
c. Language that is entirely neutral and avoids stating a clear position
d. Language that respects differences but confidently asserts and provides convincing support

Answers

Answer:

Hi! The answer would be option D. Language that respects differences but confidently asserts and provides convincing support

Explanation:

The answer is language that respect differences because that's the right approach when the other person disagrees qith your position.

Language that creates an antagonistic tone is not the answer because it does not allow views to be contrasted and that's the main purpose in an argument with someone who has a different opinion than you.

Language that dismisses the other person's opinions are bad because of the same thing. They do not allow arguments to be contrasted.

Finallty, language that  is entirely neutral and avoids stating a clear position is not the answer unless you wanna remain completely neutral. In order to show your stance and reflect a tone, you need to state your opinion, support your claims and contrast your ideas with the other person's.

Internal conflict is essential to plot.
a. True
b. False

Answers

True, the Internal conflict is essential to plot. The  internal conflict is important because it shows the main character's struggles with their own opposing desires or beliefs in the story. Thus option (a) is correct.

What is a story?

A story is a depiction of a journey. In a story we follow a character or a series of characters on a journey as they pursue something up against certain obstacles.

A story is the telling of an event, either true or fictional, in such a way that the listener experiences or learns something just by the fact that he heard the story.

A story is a means of transferring information, experience, attitude or point of view. Every story has a teller and a listener.

A story or narrative is a connected series of events told through words (written or spoken), imagery (still and moving), body language, performance, music, or any other form of communication.

Learn more about a story here:

brainly.com/question/9148951

#SPJ5

The answer is false

HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!????

Answers

is any written form of writing or drafting technical communication used in a variety of technical and occupational fields,such as computer hardware and software, engineering, chemistry, aeronautics,robotics,finance consumer, electronics, and biotechnology.

Help. Which word in the sentence is the conjunction? The girl will be riding on a bike or a scooter. A. be B. or C. the D. on

Answers

I think the correct answer is B or
A conjunction is the word that helps to keep the sentence together (ex. but, if, or, etc.)
So the correct answer here is B.