c. Marshall want to rebuild Eastern Europe
The answer is:
Human sacrifice and expansion of the empire
Moctezuma I tried to expand the empire, and managed to do so, at one point the aztec empire would take up to the shore and now border with guatemala up to Mexico city.
After Mexico's defeat on the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo came into action. The U.S. was recquired to pay 15 million dollars as compensation for damages, while taking ownership of the territories of California, half of New Mexico, most of Arizona, Nevada, Utah and parts of Wyoming and Colorado.
Mexicans that were settled in these territories, had the choice to relocate within the new limits of their country, or stay and receive American citizenship with full civil rights. This had quite big implications in U.S. culture as it became more racially diverse. In the following censuses between 1850 and 1920 most annexed mexicans were counted as "white", but in reality, segregation only grew with time and continues to do so until this day, with mexican-native americans being considered foreigners almost universally. At the same time, mexican migration to these areas also continued to rise over the years, making the contrast bigger.
Politically, we can say Mexico wasn't in a bad position in terms of their negotiation power. The U.S. had shown itself hesitant to annex Mexico's territories and having deep domestic divisions in regards to the aims and justification for the expansion. However, the military power of the U.S. overshadowed all of that and their victory was definite. The treaty established a pattern of political inequality between the two countries, and this lopsided relationship has stalked Mexican-U.S. relations ever since.
Hope this helps!
The political geographic and cultural impact of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo had significant political, geographic, and cultural impacts. Politically, it ended the Mexican-American War and established the boundary between Mexico and the United States. Geographically, it resulted in the acquisition of vast amounts of territory for the United States, including present-day California, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and parts of Colorado and Wyoming. Culturally, it resulted in the expansion of Anglo-American culture, the displacement of Mexican residents, and the exacerbation of existing racial tensions.
#SPJ6
b. Russia closely guarded its industrial knowledge and technology, while Great Britain worked to spread industrial ideas around the world.
c. Women were not paid equal to men in Russian industrial workplaces, while women and men earned equal wages in British factories.
d. Government played the key role in promoting industrialization in Russia, while individual businesses played a larger role in Great Britain.
The major difference between industrialization in Russia and Great Britain was the role of the government in promoting and guiding industrialization.
In Russia, the government played a key role in promoting industrialization by providing funding, establishing state-owned enterprises, and implementing policies to support the growth of industry. In contrast, in Great Britain, individual businesses played a larger role in driving industrialization through private investment and innovation.
Another important difference was the approach to technology and knowledge sharing. While Great Britain worked to spread industrial ideas and knowledge around the world, Russia closely guarded its industrial technology and knowledge, making it more difficult for other countries to benefit from its innovations.
Finally, while gender inequality was present in both countries, women were not paid equally to men in Russian industrial workplaces, whereas in British factories, women and men earned equal wages.
Overall, the differences in industrialization between Russia and Great Britain were shaped by a range of factors, including government policies, business practices, and cultural attitudes towards technology and innovation.
Learn more about Industrialization here
#SPJ2
Answer:
d. government played a key role in promoting industrialization in Russia, while individual businesses played a larger role in Great Britain.
Explanation:
I just did it on apx
B) suppression of dissent has no effect on the government or people
C) suppression of dissent is not healthy in a democracy
D) suppression of dissent is impossible and wastes money
The key argument against government suppression of dissent during world war i is suppression of dissent is not healthy in a democracy. Thus the correct option is C.
A government refers to an administrative system developed to maintain the functioning of any country by maintaining peace and order by implementing laws and legislation of the constitution and providing better facilities to its citizens.
To eliminate revolutionaries, secularists, and liberals who opposed the war, the government, private organizations, and "patriots" launched repressive campaigns. The Sedition Act and federal legislation limited disagreement and encouraged collaboration.
Dissenters were frequently given harsh treatment by the United States during World War I. Standing against the administration or the military machine could be a crime under the Espionage Act (1917), which was modified as the Sedition Act (1918).
Therefore, option C is appropriate.
Learn more about Government, here:
#SPJ2
I just took the test, and the correct answer is: Suppression of dissent is not healthy in a democracy. (: