They both sought to spread their religion in the New World.
Answer:
The United States wanted the removal of the monopoly of Anglo Iranian Oil company in Iran’s oil business. The United States wanted five of its petroleum companies such as Royal Dutch Shell and the Compagnie Française des Pétroles to draw to control Iran's petroleum. This led to the United States sponsoring protests by the citizens and and top government officials.
Their interference led to the overthrowing of President Mosaddegh Government by Britain who was America’s ally and the America companies coming in to draw from Iran’s oil.
In the 1950s, the United States, in collaboration with the United Kingdom, intervened in Iran primarily to safeguard its interests in the region and protect its access to Iranian oil resources. The specific event that led to this interference is known as the 1953 Iranian Coup d'état.
At that time, Iran was led by Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, who had nationalized the Iranian oil industry, including the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), which is now known as BP. This move threatened the economic interests of Western powers, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom, who had significant stakes in Iranian oil.
The consequences of this interference were significant and long-lasting. The Shah's regime, supported by the United States, became increasingly authoritarian, leading to widespread repression, curtailment of political freedoms, and human rights abuses. This eventually fueled resentment and opposition from various groups within Iranian society, including religious conservatives, intellectuals, and leftists.
Therefore, the events of the 1950s continue to shape perceptions of the United States in Iran and have had a profound impact on the geopolitical dynamics of the region.
Learn more about Iran here:
#SPJ6
Answer:
I would say the Missouri Compromise
Explanation:
Western states above a certain geographic line would be free states. The Dred Scott decision said slavery had to be an option in all western states.
a. Gettysburg, Penn.
b. Washington, D.C.
c. Philadelphia, Penn.
The process of changing the frontier into settled communities
The process of spreading United States territory across North America
The process of personal changes when one embraces Christian beliefs
the answer is A
The process of cultural change brought about by immigration
Answer:
Moral hazard is encouraged by US security guarantees, in which an individual takes a greater risk because someone else bears the cost. Allies may become complacent in dealing with rivals when they are protected by the world's most powerful military.Even non-allies are susceptible to the phenomenon if they believe they have anything like a security promise from the US, as Georgia and Russia did in 2008. Using NATO to assist Ukraine today could yield similar results. Another example is Saudi Arabia's recent adventurism. Via moral hazard, alliances may cause instability among neighbors, dragging the US into wars it unintentionally encouraged. This issue would be mitigated if allies were more worried about losing US defense.