Which of the following means to acknowledge, quote, or commend

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: You didn't list any "following," but to cite is a word that means to acknowledge, quote, or commend.

Related Questions

According to Pi, two of the biggest contradictions of life on the lifeboat wereboredom and terrorhunger and thirstfatigue and anxiety
Which describes the climax in “The Monkey’s Paw”?
Thought about Mary had a little lamb???
Which of these sentences is most precisely written? A: Let's hope that the computer can still be used. B: It is to be hoped that we can still use it. C: Let's hope we can still use the computer. D: It is to be hoped that the computer can still be used.
In poetry and fiction, the main reason for using vivid words is toA. keep the reader guessingB. create a mental imageC. explain an ideaD. illustrate the writer's bias

Please tell answers for all 4

Answers

Answer:

1. To make a comparison.

4. To suggest how one event relates to another.

Explanation:

On the contrary, compares two different things as different or opposite.

Example:

This flower smells amazing. On the contrary, this other one doesn't.

As a result, suggest the result or output of something, therefore, suggesting how it relates.

Example:

I was walking down the street when I tipped on a rock. As a result, I was injured.

"On the contrary is used to make a comparison. On the contrary, as a result, is used to suggest how one event relates to the other. As a result, you will get this question right"

Answer:

On the contrary - To suggest how one event relates another

After dinner - To indicate a shift in time

Back at the hotel - To show a change in location

As a result - To make a comparison

(The last one i'm not so confident about it being right so sorry if it's wrong)

Memories of a MemoryHave you ever witnessed something amazing, shocking or surprising and found when describing the event that your story seems to change the more you tell it? Have you ever experienced a time when you couldn't really describe something you saw in a way that others could understand? If so, you may understand why some experts think eyewitness testimony is unreliable as evidence in scientific inquiries and trials. New insights into human memory suggest human memories are really a mixture of many non-factual things.

First, memory is vague. Imagine your room at home or a classroom you see every day. Most likely, you could describe the room very generally. You could name the color of the walls, the floors, the decorations. But the image you describe will never be as specific or detailed as if you were looking at the actual room. Memory tends to save a blurry image of what we have seen rather than specific details. So when a witness tries to identify someone, her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall when faced with several tall people. There are lots of different kinds of "tall."

Second, memory uses general knowledge to fill in gaps. Our brains reconstruct events and scenes when we remember something. To do this, our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps. For example, one day at a library you go to quite frequently, you witness an argument between a library patron and one of the librarians. Later, when telling a friend about the event, your brain may remember a familiar librarian behind the desk rather than the actual participant simply because it is recreating a familiar scene. In effect, your brain is combining memories to help you tell the story.

Third, your memory changes over time. It also changes the more you retell the story. Documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony that could not have been known at the time of the event. Research has also shown that the more a witness's account is told, the less accurate it is. You may have noticed this yourself. The next time you are retelling a story, notice what you add, or what your brain wants to add, to the account. You may also notice that you drop certain details from previous tellings of the story.

With individual memories all jumbled up with each other, it is hard to believe we ever know anything to be true. Did you really break your mother's favorite vase when you were three? Was that really your father throwing rocks into the river with you when you were seven? The human brain may be quite remarkable indeed. When it comes to memory, however, we may want to start carrying video cameras if we want to record the true picture.

Which line from the text best explains what happens when witnesses repeat their accounts of an event?
Human memories are really a mixture of many non-factual things
Memory tends to save a blurry image of what we have seen
Our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps
Documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony

Answers

The correct option is:  

Documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony.  

According to the text provided, when a witness repeats the accounts of an event, it´s very likely that some details will be added, as memory changes over time, especially the more a story is retold. Furthermore, the more a witness's description is repeated, the less reliable it is.  

Answer:

Documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony

Explanation:

Reading skills go hand in hand with writing skills. The better you get at reading, the higher your chance for academic success. a. True
b. False

Answers

The answer is a. true

The house was built on a hill. A small town rested at the bottom of the hill.

Answers

what question are you asking

A short composition on a particular theme or subject that gives an author’s opinion, analysis, or interpretation is a(n) __________.a. essay
b. memoir
c. biography
d. personal account

Answers


An (A) essay is a short composition on a particular theme or subject that gives an author's opinion, analysis, or interpretation.

Their clan is now completely empty. Even the sacred fish in their mysterious lake have fled and the lake has turned the color of blood.Which sentence BEST explains the effect of using imagery in this passage?
The author uses metaphor to compare the lake and the village.
By describing the fish as having human characteristics, the author effectively uses personification to convey a sense of tragedy.
The author conveys a tragic tone with the images of fleeing fish and the blood-red lake.
The author uses direct description in addition to imagery to convey the tragedy that befell the village.

Answers

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "By describing the fish as having human characteristics, the author effectively uses personification to convey a sense of tragedy." the sentence that BEST explains the effect of using imagery in this passage is that By describing the fish as having human characteristics, the author effectively uses personification to convey a sense of tragedy.