Which amendment allows the individual states to control the schools? (1 point)

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

the tenth amendment - protection for the rights of states

Explanation:


Related Questions

How did early humans protect their limited food resources
By the mid-1930s, Hitler began violating the terms of what treaty?
What did the federalists wanted constitution to provide
Women were asked to work in factories during world War 1 because
Who did John White find that was a friend and offeredto help the colonists? -Wanchese -Manteo

People who oppose labor unions believe that unionskeep more qualified workers from being hired.
create more new jobs than workers can fill.
make many businesses more competitive.
encourage employers to reduce salaries.

Answers

A managed establishment of workers comprising traders, factories labourers are called a labour union.

It is formed to guard the privileges and claims of the labours. Labour union fights for more acceptable working situations and earnings.

The correct option is:

Option A. keep more qualified workers from being hired.

This can be explained as:

  • People who resist labour unions assume that labour unions uphold more skilled and competent employees from being employed.

  • Also, they think that if they issue the wages allocation to the less competent hirelings, they will have less funding to employ the more suitable ones.

Therefore, people against unions believe that they keep more qualified from being hired.

To learn more about union labour follow the link:

brainly.com/question/5133663

the answer for your question would be : keep more qualified workers from being hired. People who oppose labor unions believe that labor unions keep more qualified workers from being hired because if they allocating the salaries budget to the less qualified workers, they will have less budget to hire the more qualified one

hope this helps

In this activity, you will read some sermons given by George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards. Then write an essay at least 150 words long comparing the two preachers in terms of the content and the intent of their sermons.

Answers

During the First Great Awakening, preachers like George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards were active.

What is the comparison between the two preachers?

The theological perspectives that altered the colonies in America during the Great Awakening of the 1730s and 1740s vary. When this movement began, preachers traveled from city to city, proclaiming the word of their God and offering salvation.

Jonathan Edwards was a well-known preacher who delivered a well-known sermon on sinners in the hands of the well-known God. He has also given talks, written diaries, and written commentary. Edwards believed that his advice would guide people down the correct path and remind them of the consequences of not confessing their faults. Edwards, alas, saw much worse than hell.

George Whitefield was an evangelist who began preaching fervently, which aided in the spread of the awakening throughout England and the colonies. Its goal is to let Christians see their own souls and convert their hearts to God.

For more information about the preachers, refer below

brainly.com/question/1527371

Answer:

George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards were preachers during the First Great awakening.

Explanation:

  • The Great Awakening of the 1730s and 1740s differed in the religious views that changed the colonies in America. This movement came into existence, the preachers traveled from one city to another, spreading the word of their God with salvation
  • Jonathan Edwards was one of the most famous preachers to give the most famous sermon on sinners in the hands of the famous God. He has also produced lectures, journals and commentaries. Edwards hoped that his wisdom would lead people to the right path and remind them of the destiny that awaits them if they fail to confess their sins. Edwards sadly looked much deeper than hell.
  • George Whitefield was an evangelist who began to preach vigorously, which helped to spread the awakening in England and the colonies. Its purpose is for Christian people to see their souls and turn their hearts toward God.

Which nation uses about 60 percent of its land for farming?a. Finland
b. Sweden
c. Denmark
d. Norway

Answers

its definitely not Norway, I think it's Denmark, I'm pretty sure.

The Answer is:

C. Denmark

Why was Constantinople such an important city for the Ottomans to conquer?A.Constantinople was a place where you could buy anything you wanted.
B.Constantinople was very advanced in terms of its technology and education system.
C.Constantinople was a Christian stronghold and also a gateway for trade between East and West.
D.Constantinople was key to agricultural growth and trade in the area.

Answers

Final answer:

Constantinople's importance to the Ottomans was due to its status as a Christian stronghold and a gateway for trade between East and West, symbolizing religious dominance and economic control.

Explanation:

The conquest of Constantinople was of great importance to the Ottomans due to several reasons. Firstly, it was a Christian stronghold, meaning controlling it symbolised significant religious influence. Secondly, it was centrally located between the East and West, making it a vital gateway for trade. Therefore, possessing Constantinople translated into greater economic and political control.

In more detail, because Constantinople was the heart of the Byzantine Empire, a predominantly Christian entity, the Ottomans securing it symbolized their dominance over a key rival religion. Furthermore, the city's strategic position — it being a bridge between Asia and Europe — secured the Ottomans' command over key trade routes, leading to economic growth and prosperity.

Learn more about Constantinople here:

brainly.com/question/14235394

#SPJ2

The answer is C.

Constantinople was a Christian stronghold and also a gateway for trade between East and West.

Document 4In 1847, the Massachusetts legislature passed a resolution, written by Charles Sumner, opposing the war
with Mexico. This is an excerpt from the resolution.
Resolved, That the present war with Mexico has its primary origin in the unconstitutional
annexation to the United States of the foreign State of Texas, while the same was still at war with
Mexico; that it was unconstitutionally commenced by the order of the President, to General
Taylor, to take military possession of territory in dispute between the United States and Mexico,
and in the occupation of Mexico; and that it is now waged ingloriously—by a powerful nation
against a weak neighbor—unnecessarily and without just cause, at immense cost of treasure
[money] and life, for the dismemberment of Mexico, and for the conquest of a portion of her
territory, from which slavery has already been excluded, with the triple object of extending
slavery, of strengthening the “Slave Power,” and of obtaining the control of the Free States,
under the constitution of the United States.…
Source: Massachusetts House of Representatives
4 According to this resolution, what is one reason the Massachusetts legislature was opposed to the
Mexican War?

Answers

According to this resolution,  one reason the Massachusetts legislature was opposed to the Mexican War was because the president was raging an aggressive war. 

Final answer:

The Massachusetts legislature opposed the Mexican War for several reasons. They believed that it was unconstitutionally begun and constituted an attempt to extend slavery, strengthen the 'Slave Power', and dominate the 'Free States'.

Explanation:

According to the document from 1847, one reason the Massachusetts legislature was opposed to the Mexican War was they believed it was unconstitutionally begun by the President's order to General Taylor, to take military possession of territory disputed between the United States and Mexico. They also opposed the war on moral and ethical grounds, arguing it was being waged by a more powerful nation against a weaker one, unnecessarily and without just cause, resulting in great loss of life and wealth. Furthermore, they perceived the war as an attempt to extend slavery, strengthen the 'Slave Power', and obtain the control of 'Free States' under the constitution of the United States.

Learn more about Opposition to Mexican War here:

brainly.com/question/32415544

#SPJ11

Both Hinduism and Buddhism(A) supported the caste system.
(B) revered women.
(C) became increasingly popular in India.
(D) all of the above.
(E) none of the above.

Answers

Both Hinduism and Buddhism dod not support the caste system, didn't revered women and didn;t become increasingly popular in India. 

The answer is E) None of the above.