A significant effect of the First Great Awakening was that it

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: A significant effect of the First Great Awakening was that it instilled in Americans a certain sense of moral duty--especially when it came to issues like poverty and slavery. 

Related Questions

Avoiding a person because of the way they talk is an example of
Why did the U.S. government pass the Sedition Act? What were people worried about?
The U.S. Constitution provides for all of the following branches of government except for:
When war erupted in Europe in 1939, the response of the United States was
How did Sam Houston persuade the United States to annex Texas?

Which was the first European nation to "start" the Age of Exploration?A) Portugal
B) Spain
C) France
D) England

Answers

The answer is Portugal :))

How did the ideas of Hobbes and Locke differ?

Answers

There are several ways in which the  ideas of Hobbes and Locke differed, but in general Hobbes was more focused on the human condition, while Locke focused on the social contract. 

Answer:

  • Hobbes believed human beings were inherently at odds with each other and therefore needed an authoritarian government to rule over them.
  • Locke believed that human beings are morally neutral by nature, and can live side by side without a government -- but that creating a government makes society better.

Explanation:

Both English philosophers, Hobbes and Locke, believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in Leviathan in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and harmful toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his Two Treatises on Civil Government in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching about Hobbes and Locke, I've often described the difference between them in this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

Which information source do political campaigns have complete control over? public media exit polls investigative reporting paid media

Answers

The  information source that political campaigns have complete control over is: D.  paid media.

What is paid media?

Paid media is entirely under the control of political campaigns. Any sort of advertising or promotional content that a campaign purchases in order to reach and sway voters is referred to as paid media. This includes print ads, internet banner ads, sponsored postings on social media, television and radio commercials, and other types of advertising.

Paid media allows political campaigns to create their own messages, target particular groups, and manage the time and content of their adverts, in contrast to public media, which is managed by independent news organisations.

Therefore the correct option is d.

Learn more about paid media here:brainly.com/question/32703984

#SPJ6

Answer:

Paid media

Explanation:

correct on edmentum

_____ rule left Bulgaria with a wrecked economy and a contaminated environment.Democratic
Socialist
Fascists
Communist
Imperialist

Answers

Answer:

Correct answer is Socialist.

Explanation:

Democratic rule is not correct as it was established during the 90s and made important changes, and led country to EU.

Socialist rule is correct answer as during this regime that was established after WW2, economy started collapsing in the 1960s and that lasted until the democratic regime was established.

Fascists rule is not correct as fascist were not ruling in Bulgaria, except when during WW2 they were controlled by Nazi Germany.

Communist rule never happened in Bulgaria.

The same goes with the last option.

Final answer:

The Communist rule left Bulgaria with a wrecked economy and a contaminated environment.

Explanation:

The Communist rule left Bulgaria with a wrecked economy and a contaminated environment. During the Communist era in Bulgaria, the government seized control of industries and implemented central planning, which led to inefficiencies and economic decline. At the same time, environmental regulations were neglected, resulting in pollution and degradation of natural resources.

Learn more about Communist rule in Bulgaria here:

brainly.com/question/18107343

#SPJ3

Which headline is most closely associated withthe cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
(1) “Japan Signs Treaty of Kanagawa”
(2) “Nuclear Bombs Dropped on Japan”
(3) “Japan Invades Korea”
(4) “Japan Hosts Discussion on Greenhouse
Gases”

Answers

The correct answer is "2".

The nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the last episode of the campaign of the Pacific and signaled the end of the Second World War. The first bomb was deployed on August 6th, 1945 on Hiroshima. The second bomb would be deployed 3 days later in Nagasaki, on August 9th, 1945. The Japanese Empire would announce its surrender to the Allies 6 days later, on August 15th, 1945.

2 - nuclear bombs dropped on japan

Can one nation or empire take over another nation without oppressing others?

Answers

Answer:

Theoretically, Yes, but there are many details involved in this and it is so very unlikely to happen.

Explanation:

A Nation can take over another nation in order to free its people from a tyrannic ruler, for example. As long as, eventually, those people become part of a democracy-like system in which they can be well represented, have no rights removed, and are granted freedom, you might say that they were not oppressed, but freed.

Unfortunately, history doesn't often has examples of such a happening, since when a nation takes over another, it because a ruler seeks dominance and the increase of his or her own power.

This is an opinion question, but I believe that it is possible to seize political control over a country without oppressing the country's people. However, history has shown otherwise (Nazi Germany, British Empire) but we can use past mistakes to improve our future world.