Answer:
Option: D. Vietnam successfully resisted Chinese attempts at occupation, while Japan was never engaged in direct conflict with China.
Explanation:
Ming Dynasty relationship with Japan differs from its relationship with Vietnam because Vietnam has always resisted the china occupation in its land. Chinese domination in Vietnam began during 111 BC, which continued to Ming dynasty. Japan never entered into war with the Ming because it maintains healthy relations with one another.
The answer is D. Vietnam successfully resisted Chinese attempts at occupation, while japan was never engaged in direct conflict with china.
Answer:
By showing religious tolerance, both empires maintained stability and earned loyalty from different peoples.
Explanation:
i just answered a 4 year old question
In 1870, the FIFTEENTH Amendment gave all male citizens the right to vote.
The Fifteenth Amendment was one of the three amendments enacted after the American Civil War (1861-65) to ensure equality for black Americans. This Amendment, ratified on February 3, 1870, guarantees the right to vote of all U.S.'s male citizens, stating that this right will not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
The Zhou dynasty ruled China from c. 1046 BC to 256 BC. They believed they had the Mandate of Heaven, God's divine will for them to rule. Such mandate consisted of a cycle, so every dynasty would eventually decay after a period of prosperity, become authoritarian, Heaven would sent signs to show the people the ruler has lost its favour, such as droughts and famine, so the people would riot against the emperor, overthrow him and a new leader would rise to occupy his place, starting a new dynasty cycle of prosperity, decay, disasters and riots.
The Zhou used a relationship system called feudalism, they gave some loyal supporters lands and absolute power over the peasants working those lands, in exchange for soldiers. This system worked for a while until 700 BC, when landlords began fighting each other. These troubled times led some scholars to debate the proper way to rule. Three major philosophies come from this.
- Confucianism: it establishes basic relationships of people, ruler and subject, husband and wife, father and son, older sibling and younger sibling, and friend and friend. The first element is the one that rules, and the other one must obey. It establishes that the correct way of ruling is by example: the first element of it pair must set good example.
- Daoism: based on the ancient Chinese idea of the Dao, or "the Way", the force that gives order to the natural universe. It established that everyone must find dao by themselves, too many rules conflicts with the natural flow. So the best way of ruling is by ruling the least.
- Legalism: this particular conception believes that people are selfish and act upon their own interest. So good ruling would be to establish strong laws, to enforce them and to set harsh punishments to those who break them, in order to create some order in society.
Enlightenment thinkers studied government with the perspective of rule of law, individual rights, and reasoned experiences. Thinkers like John Locke and Montesquieu were influential in fostering the evolution of democracy.
Enlightenment thinkers approached the study of government with a particularly rational and empirical viewpoint. They strongly believed in the principles of the rule of law, constitutional government, and the rights of the individual, and they often criticized traditional authorities and doctrines. Developing theories such as separation of powers and social contract, they laid the foundation of what we know today as democracy.
Backing up their ideas with reasoning and experience, Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke and Montesquieu played a pivotal role in the evolution of democratic systems. They were instrumental in sowing the seeds of thought that resulted in significant changes in governmental setups worldwide.
#SPJ12