Macbeth's soliloquy reveals a state of internal conflict and turmoil. He is torn between his ambition to become king and his moral qualms about murdering Duncan, the current king.
In his soliloquy, Macbeth gives several reasons for not killing Duncan. First, he acknowledges that Duncan is a good and virtuous king who is loved by his subjects. Macbeth also fears the consequences of his actions, both in this life and in the afterlife. He worries about the potential backlash from committing regicide and the disruption it may cause to the natural order of things.
Lady Macbeth criticizes Macbeth's hesitation and questions his manhood. She accuses him of being weak and lacking the courage to seize the opportunity for power. Lady Macbeth manipulates and challenges his masculinity to goad him into committing the act.
Lady Macbeth intends to intoxicate the guards with wine and then frame them for Duncan's murder.
For more details regarding Macbeth's soliloquy, visit:
#SPJ5
Answer: Logos are the picture/design of an company. Every company has a logo. The study of logos is iconology.
Hope this helps you!
The provided phrase 'Understand two five six three' contains several internal or smaller words. Breaking the main word 'Understand', we get words like 'under', 'stand', 'and', and four independent number words can also be considered smaller words. This is a common practice in language studies for understanding word structure.
The word 'Understand two five six three' seems to be a combination of one main word 'Understand' and four numbers 'two', 'five', 'six', 'three'. If we break down the main word 'Understand', we can extract various smaller or internal words such as 'under', 'stand', 'and', among others. Additionally, the four number words stand independent on their own, so they are also considered smaller words. Therefore, there are several 'internal' words within 'Understand two five six three'.
It's important to note that the extraction of smaller words within a larger word is a common exercise in language studies. It helps in understanding the structure of words and the English language.
#SPJ12
B. potential primary source textual evidence
C. potential secondary source textual evidence
D. B and C only
The correct answer is A: an opportunity for a close reading of the primary source. Explication de Texte is a French method of literary analysis that allows for limited reader response, similar to close reading in the English speaking literary tradition. The method includes an examination of the structure, style, imagery, and other aspects of a work. It was particularly advocated by Gustave Lanson.
Explication de Text's format is:
-A brief summary of the literal, not the figurative, content.
-Text's type, structure, and its tone.
-Poetic devices used in the text
-Conclusion
b. active voice could someone help me understand the difference XD its too subtle for me
It's in passive voice.
A good rule of thumb for cases like this is that if it has any variation of the verb "to be" (is, was, were, etc.) it's passive voice.
If you wanted to switch it to active voice you need to get rid of "is", and this is usually done by switching the subject and the object (so while in the original sentence, the race car is the doing the verb, to switch it you'd need to make the sixteen-year-old boy be the one doing the verb). This new sentence would be something like:
The sixteen-year-old boy drove the racecar
Answer:
A. Passive Voice
Explanation:
I took the test on USA Test Prep and I got it right.