I use the metric system, so I am going to explain with transitions as well.
I know 12 (f)ounces is equal to 355ml.
250 ml makes up a cup of liquid.
250 ml is 8.45 ounces.
So if 8.45 ounces is a cup of liquid, and an extra 3.55 ounces is about 3/7 or rounded to 2/5.
Complete the sentence below. Choose the correct answer from the drop down menu.
The relationship between degrees Celsius and degrees Fahrenheit
.
Explain or show your reasoning.
Type your response or use the drawing space below.
The relationship between degrees Celsius and degrees Fahrenheit, as given by the equation F = 95C + 32, is not proportional.
The relationship between degrees Celsius and degrees Fahrenheit is not a proportional relationship.
In a proportional relationship, the ratio between the two variables remains constant. However, in the equation F = 95C + 32, the relationship between Celsius and Fahrenheit is not proportional because the coefficient of C is 95, indicating that the conversion between the two scales is not a simple multiplication or division by a constant value.
To illustrate this, consider two examples:
If we double the value of C, the equation becomes F = 95(2C) + 32 = 190C + 32. The coefficient of C changes, indicating that the relationship is not proportional.
If we set C = 0, the equation becomes F = 95(0) + 32 = 32. This shows that at 0 degrees Celsius, the Fahrenheit temperature is not zero, further demonstrating that the relationship is not proportional.
Therefore, the relationship between degrees Celsius and degrees Fahrenheit, as given by the equation F = 95C + 32, is not proportional.
Read on temperature on brainly.com/question/24746268
#SPJ3
Answer:
No, there are no proportional relationships here.
Step-by-step explanation:
I think you mean F=(*C)+32
No, there is not. There is no proportional relationship because proportional relationships require multiplication and division only, not any extra additive numbers, else it would not be proportional. Evidence: If we turned this into a graph, like so: y=(*x)+32, then the slope would not pass through zero.
The answer is -16, 4 and 3.
To find the local minimum.
Coordinate geometry is defined as the study of geometry using the coordinate points.
By the graph, in interval [-3,0], the smallest value is -16 and hence it is the local minimum.
In interval [0,3], the largest value is 4, so it is local maximum and smallest value is -3, which is the local minimum.
Thus, the values are -16, 4 and -3.
Learn more about co-ordinate geometry here:
#SPJ6
The graph is missing.
Answer:
the other person right with everything but its -16.18 not just -16
Step-by-step explanation:
ye