Abraham Lincoln did not see the means by which one makes a living as a fixed condition. Context from the Civil War era supports this, with the shifts from slavery to wage labor and the move from agrarian to industrial societies reflecting changes in labor conditions.
Abraham Lincoln's views reflect that he did not consider the means by which one makes a living to be a fixed or absolute condition. He interpreted the Dred Scott decision and the Kansas-Nebraska Act as attempts to spread and normalize slavery, which was a form of forced labor. Abraham Lincoln however expected this divided system of 'half Slave and half Free' would evolve into an undivided entity, either completely in favor or completely against slavery - this implies a shift in the predominant type of labor within the country at that time.
Meantime, the end of slavery reflected that labor conditions were indeed variable. The transition from slavery to wage labor did not necessarily mean a better life for the former slaves, because while they were now compensated for their tasks, they were still largely kept in a cycle of economic dependence due to requirements of daily survival and the higher interest rates enforced by lenders under the crop-lien system.
Overall, from the context of the period of time following the Civil War, there was significant evolution and change in the conditions of work and how people made a living, the shift from rural agrarian societies to more urban industrial ones and the transition from slavery to wage labor. Thus, these shifts suggest that Lincoln did not believe that the way one makes a living is a permanent condition.
#SPJ11
Answer:
A.
white females
B.
white males
C.
African-Americans, male or female
D.
young adults below the age of 25
Explanation:
B) it breaks the social contract and people can create a new government
C) citizens should combine the parts of government into a single branch
D) it just have a good reason for doing so and citizens should not complain
Answer:
I think its B just like history guy said
Explanation:
Athenian democracy was a system in which the whole citizens of Athens were allowed to participate in government, making decisions for the whole city. Roman republic, on the other hand, was a government system dominated by the wealthy elites.
Compared to the Athenian democracy, Roman republic's political power was concentrated among a select few, rather than having the entire population as part of the decision-making process. Therefore, Athenian democracy influenced our current government more than Roman republic, as our democracy is based on similar principles of equal participation.
occupied territories
Explanation:
there are many terms used to describe there territories. The colonies were controlled by Britain for the purpose of manufacturing goods and services that were not available in that current region. India was under British control as an occupational territory because England could not produce tea leaves in order to manufacture tea and India was perfect climate and soil to grow.