This question is about "Washington’s Farewell Address"
Answer and Explanation:
Among the similarities, we can see that Washington urged the American people to stimulate the elements that allowed the country's growth and the social welfare of the population, at the same time that it urged the country to recognize and eliminate the elements that caused damage to the country. In this case, he states that it was necessary to encourage collaboration between the regions of the country and to discourage disputes, to discourage the formation of political factions and the formation of authoritarian parties and providers of abuses and to stimulate the creation of economic agreements with other countries, more to discourage the creating political agreements and staying away from European conflicts.
Different characteristics can also be seen in this speech. That's because Washington scored different points in the construction of the country. On the one hand, it reinforces the need for social collaboration and in the productive system, but does not forget to point out the political dangers facing an ascending nation. In addition, he did not forget to give his opinion on political alliances, international politics and economics.
Washington's advice on unity and political parties both underscore the importance of national unity and warn against divisions. However, his advice on alliances is different as it focuses on avoiding long-term international alliances, indicating a more external-focused concern.
In George Washington's Farewell Address, Washington expressed his advice in three major sections regarding unity, political parties, and international alliances. In his discourse on unity, Washington implied that the citizens of America should consider themselves a unified whole despite varying regional interests. He emphasized the potential danger of division and factions, which resonates in his section on political parties. He made similar claims in both discussions warning the nation of the potential for turmoil and disunity.
However, there were differences in his approach with respect to these two issues and the topic of international alliances. While concerning international alliances, he advised the nation to stay independent and to avoid forming long-term alliances with other countries. Unlike his advice on unity and political parties, where he appealed to domestic concerns, the subject of alliances was more focused on the nation's foreign policy.
#SPJ3
It prevented the establishment of new colonies anywhere in the world.
It allowed active intervention by the United States in Latin America.
It helped colonies in North and South America adopt a democratic form of government.
It prevented other nations from trading with South American nations.
I believe the answer is: It viewed European interference in the Americas as a threat to US national interests.
It helped colonies in North and South America adopt a democratic form of government.
The monroe doctrine view European interference in America as a form of manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States.
He believed that all the 'help' that the European give is a camouflage for their true intention, which is wakening United States' government from the position of Ally and slowly taking over control and replace our democracy.
Answer:
A,D
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
The Nile River provided various resources to the ancient Egyptians, including:
Freshwater: The Nile River was a vital source of freshwater for drinking, irrigation, and other domestic purposes.
"Black Land": The term "black land" refers to the fertile soil deposited by the annual flooding of the Nile. This rich silt was crucial for agriculture and enabled the growth of crops.
Wildlife: The Nile River and its surrounding areas were abundant in wildlife. It supported various species of fish, birds, and other animals, which were important for food, hunting, and trade.
So, the correct answers are "freshwater," "black land," and "wildlife."
b.the Roosevelt Corollary
c.the Treaty of Portsmouth
d.the Gentleman’s Agreement
e.the Teller Amendment
A. The Treaty of Paris
to purchase new seats for the city council chambers
to loan money to local people who wanted to start a new business
to pay a debt to the local government for city beautification
A city might request money from the national government for reasons such as costly infrastructure projects like interstate highway bridge repairs, or for disaster relief following natural calamities.
A city might request money from the national government for several reasons. Key among them is infrastructure development projects such as repairing a bridge on an interstate highway that runs through the city. This is because these projects can be costly and a city's budget may not fully cover the costs, hence the need for financial assistance from the federal government. The national government has the capacity to allocate funds for various projects across the country to help enhance infrastructure and improve the lives of the citizens.
Moreover, federal funding is quite essential for disaster management. In situations when a city is affected by a natural calamity such as floods or earthquakes, it might need monetary aid from the national government to cater to emergency situations, city cleanup, and rebuilding of damaged infrastructure.
#SPJ2