Which of the following best describes the sources a historian uses to support an argument

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be "primary and secondary", since both are very important in making a convincing case. 

Related Questions

Who became president following the resignation of Richard Nixon?a. Spiro T. Agnewb. Alexander M. Haigc. Gerald R. Fordd. Neila. Armstrong
If the ____________________ was adopted states would change their election laws so that their electoral votes would automatically be awarded to the winner of the national popular vote.
What was the name given to the world war 1 veterans who ask government for an early war- related payment ?A. The Bonus Army B. The Pensioners Army C. The Payment Army D. The Doughboys
How did the U.S. government pay for the war effort during World War II? a. increasing import tariffs b. borrowing money and selling war bonds c. levying an income tax on the wealthy requiring citizens to make contributions d. requiring members of the armed forces to serve without pay
"Prior to any questioning, the person must be warned that he has a right to remain silent, that any statement he does make may be used as evidence against him, and that he has a right to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed." —Chief Justice Earl Warren in Miranda v. ArizonaBecause of the ruling in this case:A. questions officers ask during an arrest cannot be used in courtB.what suspects say when under arrest cannot be used in courtC.suspects under arrest must demand their rights from officersD. officers must inform suspects under arrest of their rights

The number of members of the Senate as compared to the House of Representatives is

Answers

The number of members of the Senate as compared to the House of Representatives is always two, whereas the number in the House varies by state. 
smaller
senate: 100
 House of Representatives: 435

Imagining yourself as a delegate from a state like New York, make a claim as to whether the Constitution should be ratifiedUse clear and specific evidence, and draw from at least two sources to support your perspective. Include at least one
counterargument and a rebuttal.​

Answers

Answer:

Imagining myself as a state delegate, I will make my complaint in the form of a letter.

Explanation:

Gentlemen

Due to the importance of creating the constitution for the success of our country, I decided to write this letter informing you of some concerns that I have to make myself want the constitution not to be ratified.

First, I believe that the constitution is unfair to some social groups. While recognizing the objective of you to establish a just, efficient government that promotes freedom and equality, the constitution does not have any guidelines in favor of women and blacks, who are extremely important to the country.

I recognize that the constitution does not hurt any of our rights as men responsible for maintaining and fighting for national sovereignty, but we cannot seek freedom just for us, even more so in a country that we establish freedom as its highest attraction, in addition to working to keep it.

By excluding women and blacks during the creation of the constitution, we are limiting these individuals to take advantage of all the privileges that our land can offer, in addition to presenting a contradictory constitution, as well as our thinking.

That said, I would like to ask that the constitution be edited before it is ratified, and I urge you to consider my suggestion.

Kind regards,

M.C.

Answer:

On the issue of ratifying the Constitution or not, I suggest that approving the Constitution is an efficient idea for the future of the United States. Our current problem of the balancing of state and federal power would be solved if we adapt the newly drafted constitution. It guarantees fair distribution of necessary and basic rights; protection of life, liberty, and property; and popular sovereignty. It also delegates a stronger, centralized power to the government, which could easily suppress violent uprisings and protect the citizens with its well-organized military power. We need a stronger government because of possible threats from other nations and internal conflict we are facing now. According to statesman Alexander Hamilton, a centralized national government with the ability to levy taxes is a fair balanced government; besides, the Constitution is open for interpretation. With the example of Shays’s Rebellion, the government under the Articles of Confederation was not able to hold down the rebellion due to a lack of military power. As a consequence, the United States population suffered massive casualties. Anti-federalists may say that ratifying the Constitution is risking popular freedom and sovereignty. However, the Constitution is “balancing” the powers, not usurping or taking away the power of the state to give the central government unlimited authority. Therefore, with all reasons being stated, I suggest that ratifying the Constitution would bring America more security and shared powers between the state and government, which would help create a more prosperous, balanced future for the United States.

Explanation:

How was the problem with the 1800 presidential election resolved?A. congress broke a tie between John adams and thomas jefferson.
B. All voters had to vote a second time to verify the initial election results
C. the house of reps. broke a tie between thomas jefferson and aaron Burr
D. the people decided candidates from oposing political parties could both run for president.

Answers

The problem with the 1800 presidential election was resolved in that "A. congress broke a tie between John adams and Thomas Jefferson," since this exposed a flaw in the electoral college system. 

Answer:

It is A. congress broke a tie between John adams and thomas jefferson.

Explanation:

At one time The US government collected taxes only through what taxes and imports. The what amendment to the constitution constitution allowed federal government to collect taxes on income

Answers

The answers are as follows
1. At one time, the US government collected taxes only through EXCISE and import.
Excise tax refers to the amount of money that has to be paid to the government on manufactured goods while import tax refers to the amount of money that has to be paid to the government on the goods that are brought into USA from other countries. These two taxes were the only ones that the US government was collecting before.
2. The sixteenth amendment to the constitution allowed federal government to collect taxes from incomes.
The sixteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States of America, which was enacted in 1909 allowed the federal government to lay and collect taxes from incomes. The tax collected is used to pay the debts and to provide for the general welfare of USA.


Answer: EXCISE and 16

Explanation:

How did progressives hope to make government more efficient and responsive to citizens?

Answers

The main way in which progressives hoped to make government more efficient and responsive to citizens is by making it more responsive to corruption in both government itself and big business--meaning that committees were formed to ensure that business were not forming monopolies that would "dupe" the citizens. 

an accurate relationship between these English and American political doctrines in terms of structure and purpose?

Answers

An accurate relationship between these English and American political doctrines in terms of structure and purpose would be that both of these countries wish to promote the spread of democracy around the world, since they view this as a basic human rights issue.