(This is so late ;-;)
True
Hope that helps
-May
O B) to form a penal colony
O C) to trade for kangaroo meat
O D) to force the Japanese out of the region
The answer is B. Australia originally served as a penal colony for British prisoners, who were deported for a variety of offences.
Answer: Europeans claimed the land and diseases spread.
Explanation:
A.
Athens used force to keep city-states from withdrawing from the league.
B.
Athens refused to contribute money or ships to the league.
C.
The purpose of the league was to keep Persia from conquering Greece.
D.
Sparta was the dominant city-state in the league.
The correct statements are A and C.
A --- Athens used force to keep city-states from withdrawing from the league: Athens chose Pericles as its leader. Pericles began his government by ending a policy of conquest. He made Athens the first and most important Greek city and achieved a total hegemony over the other cities of the Delian League, which were transformed from allied cities into subjugated cities. It was the beginning of an Empire submitted to Athens, who was the one who directed the army, the navy and diplomacy and who also wanted to establish their own political regime in the cities. In 454 BC, frightened by the failure of the expedition sent to Egypt, it was ordered to move the treasure of the League to the city of Athens, where it would be safer. All these facts, together with the increase in taxes required for the maintenance of the war, caused the cities of the League to revolt and begin to feel enemies of Athens, which also imposed their currency, their weight system and even the form of government.
C --- The purpose of the League was to keep Persia from conquering Greece: This organization was a maritime military alliance, created and controlled in the beginning by the Athenian statesman Aristides (who wrote the statutes and put it in motion), in 477 BC, at the end of the Greco-Persian Wars, in order to be able to defend against possible and new attacks by the Persians.
Nowadays, we know, thanks to science, that the human memory is very unreliable. When it comes to details specially, scientists found out that eyewitness remember so little of what is actually true and fill in the blanks with false details generated by the brain. This all when the witness is asked about what happened moments after the event.
Considering this knowledge, even though Douglas's account might be correct, it is very unlikely to be the case when it was written 22 years later.
So the answer is no, I do not trust his account.