B. both worked to win independence from British rule
C. both became the leaders of their countries and later passed power peacefully to successors
D. both traveled outside Africa to pursue education
Answer:
Both fought for independence after violent uprisings in their countries
Explanation:
Kwame Nkrumah and Jomo Kenyatta both worked with political parties to bring freedom to their countries and both worked to win independence from British rule. However, only Jomo Kenyatta became the leader of his country and passed power peacefully to his successors.
The statement that is NOT true is C: both became the leaders of their countries and later passed power peacefully to successors.
While it is true that both Kwame Nkrumah and Jomo Kenyatta worked with political parties to bring freedom to their countries (Option A), and both worked to win independence from British rule (Option B), only Jomo Kenyatta became the leader of his country and passed power peacefully to his successors. Kwame Nkrumah, on the other hand, became the first prime minister and later the first president of Ghana, but his rule became increasingly autocratic and he was eventually overthrown in a military coup.
By traveling outside Africa to pursue education, both Kwame Nkrumah and Jomo Kenyatta gained knowledge and experience that influenced their political ideologies and strategies for independence. Kwame Nkrumah studied in the United States and the United Kingdom, while Jomo Kenyatta studied in the United Kingdom.
Answer:
The Albany Plan of Union was proposed to strengthen the colonies against the French.
Explanation:
The Albany Congress was a meeting convened by the British Chamber of Commerce in 1754 in Albany, New York, United States. In this assembly it was advocated by the union of the English colonies in North America, to guarantee to some extent a defensive alliance against the French before the attack of these and for the Indian Wars.
Wilson interfered in the affairs of Mexico and believed this was "moral diplomacy" because it led to the removal of an authoritarian leader.
President Woodrow Wilson:
When he came to power in the U.S., Mexico was under the control of General Victoriano Huerta who led a very repressive regime in Mexico. Wilson used the Veracruz Incident to discredit Huerta which forced him from power.
Wilson justified this by saying that Huerta was repressive and so this fell under "moral diplomacy."
In conclusion, Wilson pursued moral diplomacy abroad but allowed racial policies at home.
Find out more at brainly.com/question/1865097.