Answer:the argument having to do with capitalism is driving the force of wealth since without these leaders capitalism would cease to thrive
Explanation:
Lincoln was considered by many to be an abolitionist.
Lincoln made it clear he would attack the South upon his election.
Lincoln's election united the nation's legislature against slavery and the South.
Abraham Lincoln's election further divided the country prior to the Civil War by highlighting the split between those who supported slavery and those who wanted it abolished.
Lincoln was a known abolitionist and by being elected, it was a clear indication that the country had shifted to being less accepting of slavery. This angered many in the South, who saw the election of Lincoln as a direct attack on their way of life.
He also promised to free the slaves after his election, further intensifying tensions between the North and South. Ultimately, this division would contribute to the Civil War, as the South felt their way of life and economy was threatened by Lincoln's election.
To know more about Abraham Lincoln, click here:
#SPJ2
Answer:
Capitalism is the system that allows wealthy people to invest their money in projects and earn (or lose!) Even more money. Allow anyone rich enough to do this. Historian Eric Williams argued that Europeans made a great deal of money from their network of colonies and their sugar, cotton and tobacco plantations. This capital, occasionally named "wealth," had to be invested someplace. It was used to pay for the industrialization of Europe. Therefore, the transatlantic slave trade and plantation wealth were the main causes of the growth of capitalism in Europe.
The decline in medieval trade was caused by