How did trade encourage he development of the renaissance

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

At the end of the Middle Ages, mainly during the15th century, merchants, artisans, and bankers from the North of Italy became very wealthy thanks to the connection to the Eastern trade routes that they had access to after the Crusades. They took advantage of their strategical position to exchange mainly spices, silk, gold, and other goods from the Middle East, India, and China and sell them to the rest of Europe. All this wealth granted them independence from feudal lords and from the Church and gave them a great economic and political power. They used this independence and power to satisfy their curiosity and their taste for fine arts.

Therefore, many families of bankers and merchants, like the Medici of Florence, became patrons of artists and scientists, who developed a totally new current of art and a new philosophical perspective. Architects like Brunelleschi, painters and sculptors like Michelangelo, and scientists and engineers like Leonardo Da Vinci, were inspired by the ancient Greek and Roman splendor in philosophy and arts in order to create a new artistic and humanistic movement: the Renaissance.

At the same time, the Renaissance was boosted by the marvels they got from the trade with Eastern markets: Arab astrolabes that allowed them to improve the navigation of the seas; gunpowder from China that permitted them to create new weapons; Persian medicine treaties; and inks to paint fine clothes, among other stuff. The Renaissance was the last period of the Middle Ages and the first stage of the modern era.


Related Questions

Which sector of the economy did not prosper in the 1920s? A. Manufacturing B. Agriculture C. The "service "sector D. Financial services E. New consumer goods
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hildago ended the war with Mexico. True or False
As farming technology improved, people could be released from farming into specific roles
Christianity began in the Jewish religion by followers of which of these people?
Which resulted from Andrew Johnson's acquittal in his Senate impeachment trial?a. The judicial branch became the most powerful branch of government. b. The legislative branch became more powerful than the executive branch. c. The executive branch became more powerful than the legislative branch. d. The balance of power among the three branches of government was preserved.

Where were the centers of domestication? What was domesticated there?

Answers

Answer:

Vavilov noted the centers of origin of cultivated plants occurred mostly in Mountaintainous regions between the Tropic of Caprion (23°28') south of the equator and about 45°N of the equator in the Old world.

I can only answer the first question I really hope u can understand and goodluck

explain the ways in which the italian renaissance in florence was a rebirth of the greco-roman classical beliefs and practices

Answers

The reason why the Italian renaissance in Florence was a rebirth of the Greco-Roman classical beliefs and practices was because during this time period, people started noticing the works of old again and started appreciating them again. This was the main reason why one could consider the Italian renaissance to have been the rebirth of Greco-Roman classical beliefs.

What job did ronald reagan hold before running for president?

Answers

Ronald Reagan had many jobs before he became the president of the United States of America. Ronald Reagan was a radio sportscaster, a TV host, and a Hollywood star who acted in more than fifty movies. Before that, he'd been a lifeguard and claimed to have rescued seventy-seven people.

governor of California

What motto did Otto Von Bismarck use to unify ?

Answers


He used the phrase "From blood and iron."

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless __________.

Answers

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona [1966], nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless they have been advised of their rights. During the case of Miranda versus Arizona, it was established that statements made during interogation by defendants in the police station will be acceptable in courts duriing trials only if the prosecution can show evidence that the defendant was informed of the right to talk to his or her lawyer before and during questioning and of the right against self incrimination before police questioning. And the prosecution should also be able to demonstrate that the defendant understand these rights but voluntarily waived them.

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless they are informed about their rights.

Further Explanation:

The decision of the “Miranda versus Arizona” stated that the individuals who are arrested must be notified about their “constitutional rights”, being arrested or questioned. As per the decision, the 5th Amendment act prohibits prosecutors from using suspect speech made at the time of custody and questioning. It is individuals’ legal right to consult an attorney before being interrogated.

The case was considered a drastic change in the “American Criminal law” as it altered the extended the importance of the 5th Amendment. Earlier, it was considered that the act will protect the citizens against the obligation to contempt and confess in the court and after the decision; it became mandatory to inform individuals about their rights. This procedure also referred to as Miranda warning and oral notifications given to the arrestee during custody.

Learn More:

1. in Furman v. Georgia (1972), the supreme court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had

brainly.com/question/2816742

2. Though the outcomes of the Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common? The government has a heavy burden to prove harm. The government can limit speech that causes harm. The government has unlimited power to limit speech. The government must follow the first amendment.

brainly.com/question/1804110

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Miranda versus Arizona

Subject: History

Keywords: Miranda versus Arizona, constitutional rights, amendment, custody, legal right, attorney, criminal law, court

What is the best research question to ask when gathering information about a person's life? Did he or she have pets as a young child?

What was the name of his or her elementary school?

What life experiences affected his or her career choice?

Did he or she learn to play a musical instrument?


please help i'm in a test

Answers

Answer:

Oh what I would say is "What life experiences affected his or her career choice". It gives off a lot of little pieces of information! I hope this helped, sorry if I'm wrong. :)