Answer:
When man learned to write, to use metals, and to work with others we say he became "civilized", although the exact parameters of civilization vary in interpretation.
Explanation:
As two significant Cold War events we can take the wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan.
The war in Vietnam was a war in which the US got itself involved because it didn't wanted to allow the communist to take over Vietnam, a strategically very important country, and be an ally of the Soviets. It was a long and bloody war, with hundreds of thousands dead and injured. The consequences of this war were that the US got its reputation shaken because of the loss, but also a long term negative effects on the population of Vietnam because of the usage of toxic and radioactive substances.
The war in Afghanistan was waged between the USSR and the US supported Afghanistan. The Soviets wanted to occupy Afghanistan and set up a communist government, which of course the US didn't wanted. After the initial success of the Soviets, the Afghans managed to push them away. The consequences were that the Islamist took over the country, and the weapons provided by the US was left in the arms of extremist Islamic organizations, which eventually led to the formation of terrorist organizations.
B. China
C. England
D. Portugal
Answer: Bbbbb!!!!
Explanation: B, Chine Would Be The Answer
They wanted to protect the rights of individuals.
They hoped to help Great Britain during the war in Europe.
They wanted to pass new taxes.
Answer:they wanted to protect the rights of individuals
Explanation:
Answer: B They wanted to protect the rights of individual states.
1. Compare and contrast the role that unfair taxation policies played in the American Revolution vs. the French Revolution.
Consider:
-“Taxation without representation” in the American colonies
-Taxation burden in the Estates system prior to the overthrow of the Bourbon monarchy
2. How did the Congress of Vienna unite countries across Europe?
Consider:
-What was Napoleon Bonaparte’s foreign policy like and why would it have pushed a pan-European backlash against France under the rule of Bonaparte?
Answer: This is gonna be a lot of typing lol.
Explanation:
1. The role that unfair taxation policies played in the American Revolution differed from the French Revolution in several ways. In the American colonies, the concept of "taxation without representation" was a major grievance. The colonists believed that they were being taxed by the British government without having a say in the decision-making process. This lack of representation fueled resentment and eventually led to the uprising against British rule. On the other hand, in the French Revolution, the taxation burden was primarily felt by the lower classes under the Estates system. The First and Second Estates, which consisted of the clergy and nobility, were exempt from many taxes, leaving the burden to fall disproportionately on the Third Estate. This unequal taxation system, combined with other social and economic grievances, contributed to the overthrow of the Bourbon monarchy.
2. The Congress of Vienna united countries across Europe through a series of diplomatic negotiations and agreements. One of the driving factors behind this unity was Napoleon Bonaparte's foreign policy, which sought to expand French influence and control over various European territories. This policy resulted in a backlash against France, as many countries saw Napoleon as a threat to their sovereignty and independence. The Congress of Vienna provided an opportunity for these countries to come together and establish a balance of power in Europe. Through negotiations and treaties, the participating nations aimed to maintain stability and prevent further aggression from France. By creating a unified front against Napoleon's ambitions, the Congress of Vienna played a crucial role in uniting countries across Europe.
The correct answer is - B) Saddam Hussein had threatened to invade Saudi Arabia.
Saddam Hussein, the leader of Iraq, was a person that had militaristic and expansionist views in his political leadership. In the 1990's, Hussein decided to attack the smaller country on the south of Iraq, Kuwait. He didn't had any real problems with invading Kuwait considering the superior weaponry and much bigger army. Than he decided that Saudi Arabia should be attacked, and than the international community decided to react, so he didn't managed to do what he wanted.
The goal of Iraq's leader, Saddam Hussein, was to gain as big access to the sea as possible, and to gain as much oil fields as possible, thus he decided to attack the two countries that he and his troops would be able to overcome without any significant problem. Unfortunately for him, his mission failed after the international community intervened.
Saudi Arabia was fearful of Iraq in 1990 because Saddam Hussein had threatened to invade Saudi Arabia.
Further explanation:
The Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein rose to a powerful position in 1979 prior to which he has served as the de facto ruler of Iraq for a few years. He had failed in his attempt to draw coalition and therefore he quickly ordered an invasion of Saudi Arabia from Kuwait. The attack was proceeded on 29th January, most of which were repulsed by U. S. Marines. However, Kharfi was occupied by Iraqi columns. An attempt to take control of the city was initiated which happened at the cost of severe Iraqi army fatalities. The emerging stronghold of the Shi'ites acted as another factor that triggered the antagonism on the part of Saudi Arabia.
Though the invasion of Kharfi was nothing but a propaganda victory, it was captured quickly by the ground forces of Saudi Arabia. Following the invasion, the land borders were locked between the two countries. However, in recent years, significant improvements can be observed in their relations which were the byproduct of various negotiations and peace settlements.
Learn more:
Answer details:
Chapter: Saudi Arabia's fear
Subject: U. S. History
Grade: High school
Keywords: Fatalities, Iraqi army, invasion of Kharfi, propaganda victory, Kuwait, Saddam Hussein, Iraqi columns, ground forces, 1990, U. S. Marines
Answer: The President
Explanation:
The Constitution provides that the President shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed