Which writer combined history with stories about gods?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Many writers throughout history have done this, but perhaps the most famous would be Thucydides, whose famous History of the Peloponnesian War was an ode to both. 
Answer 2
Answer:

Homer (his book, The Odyssey)


Related Questions

PLEASE HELP, WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST, THANK YOU, AND 5-STAR RATING!!!Helpful answers appreciated! 15pts!How did Rousseau’s ideas create a concept for creating a government in which the people and the government were both responsible for the well-being of society?
Historically, the main purpose of statues has been to ______________a. commemorate rulers and other important individuals. b. document events future generations should be aware of. c. create portraits of people who have served in government. d. serve as a tombstone for the ashes of the dead.
How were the political structures of the Jamestown and Plymouth colonies different?
Why did parliament pass the coercive acts
Which was a cause of the United States' economic prosperity throughout all of the 1950s?

Article I, Section 10 “No State shall . . . enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power . . .” According to the excerpt above, which of these is an example of an unconstitutional action? A. states exporting goods to other countries B. states imposing tariffs on goods from abroad C. states making treaties with other countries D. states writing their own constitutions

Answers

C is an example of an unconstitutional act. NO state can enter into a treaty with another country

Which of the following utopian communities was founded and established in New York State? A. Shaker Village B. New Harmony C. Spiritualist D. Oneida

Answers

D. Oneida.

Learn to use search engine

Which of the following words best describes President Jackson’s feelings toward American Indians? A. materialistic B. sympathetic C. paternalistic D. apathetic Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D

Answers

Answer:

I think it might be c

Explanation:  

How did daisy react after gatsby left for military service?

Answers

They wrote, but because her mother forbade it because he was a poor lad, she didn't say farewell to him before he went to war.

What did Daisy do when Gatsby left for war?

In a sorrowful conversation with Nick, Gatsby recalls dating Daisy in 1917 in Louisville. He claims that in addition to idolizing her social standing, riches, and celebrity, he adored her for her freshness and vigor. He continues by saying that she was the first female he had ever had a connection with and that he had lied to her about his history to convince her that he was deserving of her.

He goes on to say that after they had made love, he felt as though he had married Daisy. She made a pledge to wait for him after he departed for the war, but instead, she wed Tom, who was well-regarded in society and had her parents' blessing. He turns around as he leaves and yells that Gatsby is more valuable than the Buchanans.

Learn more about The Great Gatsby, here:

brainly.com/question/837802

#SPJ5

They corresponded with each other but she failed to say goodbye to him before he went to war because her mom wouldnt let her because he was a poor boy

How credible is rummel estimates of japan genocide?

Answers

The credibility of Rummel's estimates of Japanese genocide is disputed. Some historians believe that his estimates are too high, while others believe that they are accurate.

Rummel's estimates are based on a variety of sources, including official Japanese records, Allied war crimes trials, and postwar surveys.

However, some historians have questioned the accuracy of these sources.

For example, they argue that the Japanese government may have underreported the number of people killed during the war, and that the Allied war crimes trials may have been biased against the Japanese.

Other historians have defended Rummel's estimates, arguing that they are based on the best available evidence.

They also argue that Rummel's estimates are consistent with other estimates of Japanese war crimes.

Ultimately, the credibility of Rummel's estimates is a matter of debate.

However, there is no doubt that the Japanese military committed numerous acts of genocide during World War II.

The exact number of people killed is unknown, but it is likely in the millions.

Learn more about World War II

brainly.com/question/7745710

#SPJ11

Final answer:

Rummel's estimates of Japan genocide during World War II, based on his research and analysis of historical data, provide valuable insights into the scale and impact of the atrocities committed by the Japanese government. While debates regarding the accuracy of specific figures exist, Rummel's work contributes to our understanding of these events.

Explanation:

Rudolph J. Rummel, a political scientist, conducted extensive research on democide, which includes genocide, and provided estimates of Japan genocide during World War II. His estimates are based on a thorough analysis of historical data, including government records, eyewitness accounts, and other sources.

Rummel's work focuses on the number of deaths caused by the Japanese government, particularly in relation to the Nanjing Massacre and other atrocities committed by the Imperial Japanese Army. He aimed to shed light on the scale and impact of these events.

While Rummel's estimates have been influential in understanding the magnitude of Japan's wartime atrocities, it is important to note that estimating the exact number of victims in such historical events can be challenging. Different sources may provide varying figures, and debates among scholars regarding the accuracy of specific estimates are not uncommon.

However, Rummel's research and analysis contribute to our understanding of the atrocities committed during World War II and the impact they had on the affected populations.

Learn more about credibility of rummel's estimates of japan genocide here:

brainly.com/question/12445988

#SPJ14

Need help with literature!!Hamlet act 1 questions

which characters are guessing about the behaviors of others in the first act? how are the characters testing each other?

Answers

- Which characters are guessing about the behaviors of others in the first act?

- Horatio is guessing about the behavior of the soldiers (Bernardo and Francisco). he believes they are imagining things about seeing a ghost.

- Queen Gertrude is guessing that her son Hamlet is only depressed bout his father's dead.

- Hamlet is guessing that all the public displays of mourning by Claudius are fake manifestations of emotion and that he only cares about the power of being King of Denmark and the pleasure of having taken Queen Gertrude as his wife. Hamlet is also guessing that his mother does not care about King Hamlet's death and is only happy to have a new husband share her bed. Furthermore, Hamlet is initially guessing about his own grief. Something bothers him enormously about the whole situation. He distrusts Claudius viscerally yet he is also uncertain of his own thoughts and emotions and even contemplates suicide. When he meets the Ghost he does not immediately accept the Ghost's accusation but decides to put King Claudius under surveillance and find out the truth.

- Claudius is guessing about Hamlet's moroseness as just being infantile emotional affectation.

- Laertes is guessing about Hamlet's affection for Ophelia to be just plain lust disguised as love.

- Polonius also thinks that Hamlet's feelings for Ophelia are only physical desire and considers that Ophelia's feelings for Hamlet are only childlish illusions.

- how are the characters testing each other?

- Horatio submits the soldiers to the production of actual evidence. He only believes them when he sees the Ghost himself. He even has the soldiers attack the ghost with spears to see if it is really a ghost.

- Being tested by Horatio, the soldiers ask him to test the Ghost since they respect him for being a scholar and they want him to use his knowledge to make sure what they have seen is not a figment of their imagination.

- Hamlet decides, after speaking with the Ghost, to test Claudius by feigning madness induced by grief, until he is able to prove or disprove the Ghost's accusations.

The entire act is a warning about how appearances can be deceiving.

-