Abraham Lincoln was the first president elected from the Republican political party
Fairness in inheritance division depends on cultural values. Primogeniture maintains tradition; coparcenary ensures equal distribution, each with pros and cons.
The fairness of inheritance division between primogeniture and coparcenary depends on cultural, societal, and individual perspectives. Both systems have their advantages and drawbacks.
Primogeniture entails passing the entirety of an estate to the firstborn child, often the eldest son. Proponents argue it maintains estate integrity and prevents fragmentation, enabling better management. However, it can be seen as inherently unfair, depriving other siblings of a fair share.
Coparcenary, on the other hand, involves dividing the inheritance equally among all heirs, typically children. This approach promotes equality and prevents the concentration of wealth but can lead to property fragmentation and potential disputes.
The fairness of each system depends on societal values. Primogeniture may preserve tradition but could be considered unfair by those who prioritize equitable wealth distribution. Coparcenary fosters equality but may lead to land division issues.
Ultimately, fairness depends on the specific cultural, legal, and familial context. Many societies have moved away from primogeniture toward more egalitarian systems in pursuit of greater fairness in inheritance distribution.
For more questions on Inheritance
#SPJ1
Shortly after the arrival of the European settlers, the population of Native Americans quickly diminished because of the new diseases brought to the continent that were new for the Native Americans. This happened in North, Central and South America, all around the continent, the new sicknesses killed most of the indigenous people, which is why the European conquerors brought African slaves, since they could to endure the diseases and the hard labor.
Thus, the right answer is Over time, Native American slaves were replaced by African slaves because the Native Americans were dying of diseases.
Answer:
C. Over time, Native American slaves were replaced by African slaves because the Native Americans were dying of diseases
Explanation:
I took the test
B. Russia only has a peasant class
C. China did not have a bourgeoisie
D. Russia did not have a bourgeoisie
The correct answer is:
A. China lacked a proletariat
Explanation:
Both the Russian and the Chinese Revolutions were focused on installing and spreading Communism after the end of a World War (Russia after World War I, and China after World War II) and on ending the social inequality created by a big gap between society. Lenin and Mao were inspired by Marx's theories of Communism but the focus they used was different because Russia had a big proletariat, also known as working class population and China had a big population of peasants who worked on agriculture.
The correct answer is C) Noble landowners governed their own regions.
In both, the Shang and Zhou societies, different regions of Noble landowners governed their own regions.
The Bronze Age of China begab around 2000 BC. It saw the development of the Shang Dynasty from 1600 to 1046 BC. Later, this dynasty was conquered by the Zhou, that came from up north the Yellow River, from Xi'an, in the province of Shaanxi. The Zhou Dynasty lasted from 1046 to 256 BC. During both, the Shang and Zhou societies, different regions of Noble landowners governed their own regions.
The other options of the question were A) Each peasant had control of one piece of land, B) Kings controlled every aspect of their own areas, and D) governors sent representatives to each region.