A monarchy can be like a dictatorship or it can be Part of a Democracy

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Yes, this is true.

If it's like a dictatorship, it's referred to  as "absolute monarchy". Example today: Swaziland

If it's a part of democracy, it's a constitutional or parliamentary monarchy. Example: UK

Related Questions

What are social problems in Nigeria?​
The Fourteenth Amendment A. ended the Reconstruction. B. only gave partial citizenship to African Americans. C. grew out of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and it gave full citizenship to all African Americans. D. was never ratified.
what did william bradford's quote "as one small candle may light a thousand, so the light here kindle hath shone unto many, yea, in some sort, to our whole nation."mean
What was the Manhattan Project?
When did the holocaust end

MESOPOTAMIA Besides land, what resources and acheivements made the city-states desirable to conquerors?

Answers

The wealth of these city-states were flourishing, and it is visible because of the infrastructure being built. Note that better infrastructure is an opportunity for better trade. Trade = wealth.

Canada's spoken languages have been MOST influenced by the countries of

Answers

England and France
After the wars and all
Canada's spoken languages have been MOST influenced by the countries of France. That is because long ago, the France lived there and traveled to Canada also. 

Who declared Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire?

Answers

Emperor Theodosius I :)

"
Emperor Theodosius I, who made Nicene Christianity the state church of the Roman Empire. Nicene Christianity became the state church of the Roman Empire with the Edict of Thessalonica in 380 CE, when Emperor Theodosius I made it the Empire's sole authorized religion"

Which Native American group is known for having built huge, earthenstructures in the Mississippi River

Answers

Answer:

mound builders

Explanation:

The various cultures collectively termed "Mound Builders" were inhabitants of North America who, during a 5,000-year period, constructed various styles of earthen mounds for religious, ceremonial, burial, and elite residential purposes. These included the pre-Columbian cultures of the Archaic period, Woodland period (Calusa culture Adena and Hopewell cultures), and Mississippian period; dating from roughly 3500 BCE (the construction of Watson Brake) to the 16th century CE, and living in regions of the Great Lakes, the Ohio River Valley, and the Mississippi River valley and its tributary waters.[1]

Since the 19th century, the prevailing scholarly consensus has been that the mounds were constructed by indigenous peoples of the Americas. Sixteenth-century Spanish explorers met natives living in a number of later Mississippian cities, described their cultures, and left artifacts.[2] Research and study of these cultures and peoples has been based mostly on archaeology and anthropology.

Answer:

Cahokia

Explanation:

Cahokia is the most sophisticated prehistoric Native civilization north of Mexico. Best known for large, man-made earthen structures, the city of Cahokia was inhabited from about A.D. 700 to 1400.

Judges in federal appellate courts determine whether

Answers

Answer:

Judges in federal appellate courts determine whether lower court made an error in a case.

Explanation:

The appeals courts deliver an instance of understanding which allows respondents to contest for a reasonable analysis of the judgment. It is a democratic process of ensuring the comprehensive benefit of defense considering the tribunal which can analyze the preceding condemnation. This overrides the situation of any errors or unfairness of the authorities.

Judges in federal appellate courts determine whether:

the law has been applied correctly in the trial court

legal procedures were followed properly in the trial court

the defendant's constitutional rights were violated during the trial or investigation

What are Appellate courts

Appellate courts, also known as courts of appeals, are part of the federal judicial system that is responsible for hearing appeals and reviewing cases from the lower courts.

Their job is not to re-try cases or hear new evidence, but rather to determine if legal errors that might have affected the outcome occurred in the lower court's proceedings. They provide a check on the power of the trial courts by overseeing their decisions and helping ensure consistency in the application of the law.

Learn more about appellate courts at

brainly.com/question/20535528

#SPJ6

I know this is better for French, but I feel like it fits here.Write a short dialogue in French between a judge and a lawyer. Make sure it has at least 5 lines with more than one word each. It can have phrases that describe the crime, a verdict, etc.

Since I'm posting it here, I obviously don't need it to be in French. Please just make it simple enough for me to self-translate back.

Answers

hint: This is copy from a website


LAWYER: Based on what you’ve told me so far, it sounds like your competitor is infringingyour trademark.

CLIENT: Exactly. And the potential damage to my business is tremendous. Besides the usual threatening letters, what legal action can we take?

LAWYER: Well, there are several things we can do. First, we can file an action in the district court and move for an injunction against your competitor. We need to show the probability of irreparable harm to your business. If this outweighs the probable harm to their business while the case is pending, we can get a temporary injunction. This injunction will prevent them from using the trademark, on pain of fine.

CLIENT: I’m sure they’ll challenge that. They won’t confess to the claim.

LAWYER: Right. Actually, ‘confess’ is used in criminal cases. In civil cases we say ‘admit the claim’.

CLIENT: Of course, a slip of the tongue.

LAWYER: We’ll also be seeking declaratory relief and damages for any and all compensable losses you’ve suffered.

CLIENT: I know what damages are, but what’s declaratory relief?

LAWYER: It’s a declaration by the court that you are the rightful owner of the trademark. As for damages, if we’re going to be able to recover your losses we’ll first have to prove them. I’d like one of my associates to meet with your people to start gathering evidence.

CLIENT: That’s fine – as soon as possible.

LAWYER: What do you think the chances are of settling with your competitor?

CLIENT: Poor. It’s a very bitter feud.