both worked only in agriculture
B.
both received wages for their work
C.
both had restrictions on personal rights
D.
both had a legal status based on their mother's status
Answer:
Ernest Rutherford is known for his work with the gold foil experiment and the discovery of the atomic nucleus.
Explanation:
Ernest Rutherford was a British physicist and chemist born in New Zealand.
He devoted himself to the study of radioactive particles. He found that the radioactivity was accompanied by a disintegration of the elements, which earned him to win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1908. He created an atomic model, with which he proved the existence of the atomic nucleus, in which all the positive charge and almost the entire mass of the atom is found.
Answer: The answer is really Proton. Although he did discover the Atomic Nucleus, he is most known for the discovery of the Proton.
b. lead the republic, Antony.
c. end Cimber's brother's banishment, Cassius.
d. bathe his hands in Caesar's blood, the people.
Answer: CHANCELLOR
Otto von Bismarck was appointed Chancellor of Germany by King Wilhelm I in 1871.
Context/details:
Otto von Bismarck was Minster President and Minister of Foreign Affairs for the Kingdom of Prussia. He used Realpolitik (reality politics) methods to increase Prussian power and align other German states together with Prussia into the German Empire. In his leadership of Prussia, Bismarck helped create wars with neighboring countries to increase national pride among the German people. The main wars that Bismarck provoked in increasing national pride and unity among the German people were the Austro-Prussian War (1866) and the Franco-Prussian War (1870-71). Following the Francp-Prussian War, the German Empire was established, and Wilhelm I appointed Bismarck to the position of Chancellor.
Answer:
Statement 1 and 2 are falsifiable while that of statement 3 to 6 are not falsifiable.
Explanation:
As the statements are not given, the statements to be classified are as below
First two statements are Falsifiable as the reasons are below
As for these two statements there are counter facts/cross checking facts from which the truthfulness of the statements can be identified. For the 1st statement, the historic facts can be used and for the 2nd statement, the medical records for the death of Kennedy can be used to test the claim
However for the statements 3 to 6 ,the statements are consider not falsifiable as there is no appropriate counter checking to define the truthfulness of these statements.