Is 17/25 in decimal terminate or repeat?

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: Firstly we need to realize that 17/25 is as much as 68/100 (because 4 * 17 = 68 and 4 * 25 = 100). Now we can write it as a decimal of 0.68.

0.68 is a terminate decimal because there is no other digit than 0 we can add on its right hand side.

Answer 2

Answer: terminate because 17/25 is the same as 68/100 and that is 0.68. So, it is terminate

Related Questions

What is the LCM of 2 and 5
Help me please I beg you! :( :)
Solve the following when x=3 6x - 3x -5.
12x−5y=−20y=x+4
The distance of planet Jupiter from the Sun is approximately 7.8 ⋅ 108 kilometers, and the distance of planet Saturn from the Sun is 1.5 ⋅ 109 kilometers. About how many more kilometers is the distance of Saturn from the Sun than the distance of Jupiter from the Sun

John and Bill walk towards to each other’s house. If both leave at 10 am, they meet 10 minutes later. If Bill leave 3 minutes later then John, they’ll meet 9 minutes after Bill leaves. How long does it take for Bill to walk to John’s house?

Answers

I do not now but i think it 7 minutes because he left 3 minutes later.I help

|60| ___ |-60|
>
=
<
fill in the blank

Answers

The inequality ∣60∣≤∣−60∣ holds true. This is because the absolute value of both 60 and -60 is equal to 60.

The expression ∣60∣≤∣−60∣ can be evaluated by calculating the absolute values on both sides. The absolute value of 60 is 60, and the absolute value of -60 is also 60. So, ∣60∣=∣−60∣=60.

Since 60 is equal to 60, the inequality ∣60∣≤∣−60∣ is true. This inequality states that the absolute value of 60 is less than or equal to the absolute value of -60. In this case, since both absolute values are equal, the statement is true. The absolute value function essentially removes the negative sign from a negative number, making it positive, and in this case, the absolute values of 60 and -60 are indeed the same, resulting in a true inequality.

To know more about inequality:

brainly.com/question/28823603

#SPJ3

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

mod means positive...that's why both are equal 60=60

Solve the following equation:
12(b+2)+3b=−1

Enter your answer as a fraction.

Answers

The solution to the equation 12(b+2) + 3b = -1 is b = -5/3.

What is the solution to the given equation?

Given the equation in the question:

12( b + 2 ) + 3b = -1

To solve the equation 12( b + 2 ) + 3b = -1, first apply the distributive property.

Distribute the 12 across the terms inside the parentheses:

12( b + 2 ) + 3b = -1

12×b + 12×2 + 3b = -1

Simplifying, we get:

12b + 24 + 3b = -1

Collect and combine the like terms on the left side of the equation:

12b + 3b + 24 = -1

15b + 24 = -1

Subtract 24 from both sides of the equation:

15b + 24 - 24 = -1 - 24

15b = -1 - 24

15b = -25

Divide both sides by 15:

b = -25/15

Simplify

b = -5/3

Therefore, the value of b is -5/3.

Learn more about equations here: brainly.com/question/14686792

#SPJ2

Answer: -5/3

Step-by-step explanation:

12(b + 2) + 3b = -1

12b + 24 + 3b = -1

15b + 24 = -1

15b = -1-24

b = -25/15 = -5/3

Answers

B would be the right answer because there are 12 inches in a foot.

64 divided by 12 is 5 with a remainder of 4 '

5 ft. 4 in.

B

If a set of six numbers that include both rational and irrational numbers is graphed on a number line, what is the fewest number of distinct points that need to be graphed?

Answers

If there are no duplications among the six numbers, then they sit at
six different points on the number line.

Irrational numbers are on the same number line as rational ones.
The only difference is that if somebody comes along, points at one of them,
and asks you to tell him its EXACT location on the line, you can answer him
with digits and a fraction bar if it's a rational one, but not if it's an irrational one.

For example:

Here are some rational numbers. You can describe any of these EXACTLY
with digits and/or a fraction bar:

-- 2
-- 1/2
-- (any whole number) divided by (any other whole number)
   (this is the definition of a rational number)
-- 19
-- (any number you can write with digits) raised to
   (any positive whole-number power)
--    387
--    4.0001
-- (zero or any integer) plus (zero or any repeating decimal)
-- 13.14159 26535 89792
--    (any whole number) + (any decimal that ends, no matter how long it is)
   (this doesn't mean that a never-ending decimal isn't rational; it only
   means that a decimal that ends IS rational.
   Having an end is enough to guarantee that a decimal is rational,
   but it's not necessary in order for the decimal to be rational.
   There are a huge number of decimals that are rational but never end.
   Like the decimal forms of 1/3, 1/6, 1/7, 1/9, 1/11, etc.)
-->    the negative of anything on this list

Here are some irrational numbers. Using only digits, fraction bar, and
decimal point, you can describe any of these as close as anybody wants
to know it, but you can never write EXACTLY what it is:

-- pi
-- square root of √2
--    any multiple of √2
-- any fraction of √2
-- e
-- almost any logarithm

There are 4,200 adults in Lakeview. Three-eighths of the adults in Lakeview do not have children. How many adults in Lakeview have children?

Answers

do 3/4 divided by 4200, or maybe vice versa

4,200 ÷ 3 = 1,400
1,400 adults in Lakeview have children
I think...

Other Questions

Tina solved an equation incorrectly, as shown below:Step 1: 8x = 24 Step 2: x = 24 − 8 Step 3: x = 16 Which statement best explains why Step 2 is incorrect in Tina's solution? She did not divide 24 by 8. She did not add 8 to 24. She did not multiply 24 by 8. She did not multiply 24 eight times.

-5y + 8 = -3y + 10 Having a bit of trouble with this equation.

Is two thirds the same as four sixths

Witch point in a triangle is equidistant form the vertices of the triangle