Assessing biological ancestry before sex is primarily done to understand potential health conditions or diseases that are inheritable. It provides a broader understanding of the genetic makeup and can help identify specific inherited traits and conditions for a complete health profile.
Sex and biological ancestry are both important aspects examined when understanding an individual's identity and health. However, assessing biological ancestry before sex is not to determine the individual's gender identity or to deduce sex from biological ancestry, but rather to understand potential health conditions or diseases (Option C). This is due to the fact that certain genetic traits, which could influence one's health profile, are passed down through biological ancestry. Moreover, biological ancestry can reveal a deep genetic pool that isn't limited to sexually inherited traits.
Also, this process helps provide a broader understanding of a person's genetic makeup before narrowing down to the level of biological sex. In addition to this, the information acquired from assessing one's biological ancestry may hint towards specific inherited genetic conditions and traits, forming a more comprehensive health profile.
Learn more about Biological Ancestry and Sex here:
#SPJ11
B) 71%
C) 33%
D) 78%
You have the chance of rain
P(R) = 0.9
And the chance of wind and rain
P(R∩ W)=0.7
The probabilities of windy weather is
P(W)===0.78
The correct answer then is D) 78%
Answer:
78%
Explanation:
B) Let the residents also hire a group to conduct the research and analyze the data.
C) The agricultural chemical industry would be better suited to conduct the research.
D) The research group hired by the farmers may present a biased picture of the situation.
Answer:
The correct answer is option D) "The research group hired by the farmers may present a biased picture of the situation".
Explanation:
One of the basic premises of a reliable scientific investigation is that the researches should not have any conflict of interest. A research group hired by farmers to investigate the claims of local residents regarding the use of insecticides and fungicides most likely would not act unbiased. The proper way to perform the research is to hire an independent research group that would not have any conflict of interest in the matter of study.
Answer:
The correct answer is D)
Explanation:
Here's why:
The research group hired by the farmers may present a biased picture of the situation. An outside agency, one that is not paid by either the residents or the farmers, would be the best group to conduct research and analyze the results in order to find an unbiased solution to the problem. There should be no local involvement in data collection or analysis since any local residents, farmers, or politicians, have their own agenda.
b. The time it takes for the nucleus of one atom of a radioactive isotope to split in half.
c. The time it takes for half of the nuclei in a sample of a radioactive isotope to decay.
d. The time it takes for the nucleus of one atom of a radioactive isotope to decay.
The time it takes for the nucleus of one atom of a radioactive isotope to split in half is half life.
To know more about radioactive isotope here
#SPJ2