Answer:
Context clues and knowledge of root words and prefixes
Explanation:
When we are reading and find an unusual or unknown word within a text, we can use the surrounding information to help comprehend the meaning of that word, as well as its pronunciation, when we do this, we are using the context clues. By using this technique we can save a lot of time and enhance our comprehension of the piece of writing as our reading would flow naturally and without major irruptions.
Similarly, a technique very helpful when finding an unknown word in a text is to have a knowledge of root words, prefixes and suffixes, as all these parts of a word have an standard meaning.
For example, in the word "prehistory", we can know the meaning of the word by simply having a knowledge of the prefix "pre" (which means "before"), and the root word "history" (the study of past events). Same with the word "illegal", the prefix "il" expresses the negative of something and "legal" means related to the law.
Judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion by the fact that the dissent uses cases with similar conclusions as support and the correct option is option D.
In judicial reviews, both the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion analyze and interpret the law to determine the constitutionality or legality of a particular issue. However, they often arrive at different conclusions.
In the majority opinion, the justices who form the majority provide the legal reasoning and rationale for their decision. They typically rely on legal principles, precedents, constitutional interpretation, and sometimes public policy considerations to support their conclusions. The majority opinion sets the legal precedent for future cases.
On the other hand, in the dissenting opinion, justices who disagree with the majority decision present their own analysis and reasoning. The dissenting justices may use cases with similar conclusions to argue against the majority's interpretation of the law. They may highlight inconsistencies in the majority's reasoning or provide alternative interpretations of the law.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about Judicial reviews, here:
#SPJ5
B. first person
C. third person omniscient
3rd person omniscient