- He ignored their rulings and kept the programs.
- He tried to pack the Court with six more justices.
- He declared the dissenting justices incompetent.
Franklin Roosevelt responded to the Supreme Court ruling by trying to pack the court with additional justices who would agree with him.
Under President Franklin Roosevelt, the Supreme court declared the New Deal Program because they ruled the act was unconstitutional by a 5-4 margin.
However, the President responded to the Supreme Court ruling by trying to pack the court with additional justices who would agree with him.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about Franklin Roosevelt
#SPJ6
A belief that a favorable balance of trade, between its colonies and other countries, can allow a country to grow wealthier and more powerful
A belief that a country should be the strongest militarily
A system in which the colonies make all of the finished products for the benefit of the mother country
A system in which trade is fair and equal between all countries
A belief that a favorable balance of trade, between its colonies and other countries, can allow a country to grow wealthier and more powerful is a Mercantile System. The correct option is A.
System of accrual or commerce. The Mercantile Basis of Accounting is another name for the Accrual Basis of Accounting. Transactions in this system are noted as they happen. Regardless of whether they are received or accrued, revenue is recorded in the books of accounts at the time it is earned.
Governments utilized their economy to increase state power at the expense of other nations during the period of mercantilism. The goal of governments was to increase bullion wealth and make sure that exports outpaced imports.
Thus, the ideal option is A.
Learn more about Mercantile System here:
#SPJ2
Answer:
A belief that a favorable balance of trade, between its colonies and other countries, can allow a country to grow wealthier and more powerful
Explanation:
i hope this helps
Answer:
Explanation:
You can't really answer this without more information to be absolutely sure you are right. The only thing you can do is make a guess, and that's never a good idea.
However that being said, you have two choices. You can try and decide why the drop between 2000 and 2005 (civil appeals) took place. You also need to notice the drop between 2005 and 2010 (criminal appeals). You can't tell anything about legal representation. We don't have enough information unless you are given some somewhere else.
I think the right answer to this is that more criminal actions are being dropped before trial (only because there are fewer of them).
C
Answer:
Right to a speedy trial :)
b. a belief in more than one god
c. the belief that there is no god
d. the belief that the existence of a god cannot be proven
A. A belief in one god
Hope This Helps ^_^