In view of Soviet policies toward Eastern Europe in the postwar era, what reasons did people in Eastern Europe have for resistance?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Basically, Soviet Union imposed lack of freedom and self-determination on the people's of Eastern Europe. The governments chosen by people before the war were abandoned in favour of puppet governments which often took bad politically determined decisions, such as rejecting Marshall's plan.


Related Questions

Which of the following results from having a nation having conflicting economic goals?A. the nationalizing of some industries B. the need to rank choices in order of importance C. the need for economic safety nets D. government regulation of domestic industries
Can someone help fast will be marked as brainiest
According to the Open Door policy, China’s ability to tax trade A.inspired some countries to levy their own taxes. B.discouraged some nations from trading there. C.angered Japan and Russia. D.encouraged fair trade for all countries.
Many southern states tried to limit the effects of radical reconstruction by
What events of 1949 thrust the Cold War into a new and seemingly more dangerous stage

Mike Tyson earned about $200 million over his 15-year boxing career, but by 2003 he was in financial trouble. This is an example of __________.

Answers

The answer is poor management skills.  In past, this caused many prominent athletes to struggle financially.  Many did not manage their earnings well and spent them right away. Others got swindled by their managers or made bad investments. These days athletes are more careful on how they handle their money because they have seen what happened to those who do not.

Which of the following resulted from the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)? A. a decrease in the United States' trade deficit B. an increase in the United States' national debt C. a decrease in federal spending on security for the U.S.-Mexico border D. an increase in the flow of goods between the United States and Mexico

Answers

Which of the following resulted from the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)?

Answer: Out of all the options presented above the one that represents the result from from the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement is answer choice D) an increase in the flow of goods between the United States and Mexico. It was signed into law by president clinton and as a result there was an increase of maquiladoras in mexico where 90% of goods produced there were shipped directly to the US.

I hope it helps, Regards.

The signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement resulted to an an increase in the flow of goods between the United States and Mexico.

What is NAFTA?

This is Free Trade Agreement signed between Mexico, U.S. and Canada to facilitate free trading among the states.

Hence, the agreement led to an increase in the flow of goods between the United States and Mexico.

Therefore, the Option D is correct.

Read more about NAFTA

brainly.com/question/2797413

#SPJ5

When did the international economy collapse and why- durning the great depression

Answers

Many people during the roaring 20s had lots of money and decided to start buying stocks. More and more people bought the stocks until they were valued more than their actual worth. Americans poured their money, sometimes their life savings, into stocks. In October of 1929, the booming American economy came to an abrupt end as the US stock market crashed. Panicky investors tried to sell their stocks. Banks had made loans that people could not repay. Depositors grew nervous about their money and tried to withdraw it all from the banks, leading to bank failures. Businesses went broke, once-busy factories closed, and millions of workers lost their jobs. 

This affected other nations because once America lost it's prosperity and money, they no longer traded. Due to bank failures and factories closures, America did less business overseas, spreading the Great Depression all over.

Hope this helped ^.^ 
ps, this is from my notes. :)

General McClellan proved to be an incapable leader for the North for two reasons. What were they?

Answers

Many sources believe that General McClellan was too cautious to be a leader. He refused to proceed with anything until everything was fully prepared. He also did not know much about his enemy, which is crucial in any war. He underestimated them greatly. Hope this helps.
McClellan has been criticized by some historians for failure to commit his reserves at the end of the day to destroy the Rebels. He was not quick to act which lead to many failures. They were outnumbered and that was very clear to all but he was confident in himself. Lincoln stood beside him helping him by pressing acts and eventually taking over. 

How is the spread of Islam similar to the spread of Christianity

Answers

Answer:

both religions where apart of the middle east an were moved arounf the world

Explanation:

Evaluate the significance of audience in the production of history?

Answers

The significance of the audience in the production of history is paramount, shaping the narrative's perspective and influencing the selection of information and themes.

The role of the audience in the production of history cannot be underestimated. Historians craft narratives with a keen awareness of their readership, recognizing that perspectives and biases shape the telling of historical events.

This awareness is twofold: historians consider the contemporary audience's interests and societal context, as well as anticipate the impact on future generations.

The intended audience influences the selection of information, emphasis on specific events, and portrayal of key figures.

For example, a history book aimed at academia might delve deeply into nuanced analyses, while a popular history aimed at a general audience may prioritize engaging storytelling and simplified explanations.

Furthermore, the cultural, political, and social inclinations of the audience impact the historian's interpretations and framing of events.

The power of the audience in shaping history underscores the dynamic nature of historical interpretation. Historians are not passive conveyors of facts but active participants in constructing a narrative that resonates with their audience while maintaining scholarly rigor.

Learn more about historical interpretation

brainly.com/question/23036442

#SPJ11

Final answer:

The significance of the audience in the production of history lies in its ability to shape the narrative and interpretation of historical events. Historians consider their audience when selecting and presenting information, taking into account their prior knowledge, interests, and biases. The audience's expectations and values also influence the way history is presented, as historians may emphasize certain aspects or perspectives to engage and resonate with their audience. By considering the audience, historians ensure that their work is accessible, relevant, and meaningful.

Explanation:

Significance of Audience in the Production of History:

In the production of history, the audience holds great importance as it influences the way historical events are presented and interpreted. Historians consider their audience when selecting and presenting information, as the intended audience influences the style, tone, and content of historical accounts.

The audience can vary and may include scholars, students, policymakers, or the general public. Historians must take into account the prior knowledge, interests, and biases of their audience to effectively communicate historical information.

Furthermore, the audience's expectations and values play a significant role in shaping historical narratives. Historians may emphasize certain aspects or perspectives to engage and resonate with their audience. This can involve highlighting the experiences of marginalized groups, exploring different interpretations of events, or focusing on themes that are relevant to the audience's concerns.

The significance of the audience lies in its ability to influence the interpretation and understanding of history. Historical narratives are constructed with the audience in mind, aiming to engage, educate, and challenge their perspectives. By considering the audience, historians can ensure that their work is accessible, relevant, and meaningful to those who engage with it.

Learn more about significance of audience in the production of history here:

brainly.com/question/14176468

#SPJ14