The Supreme Court case United States v. Nixon led to gaining executive privilege limits to executive privilege Nixon keeping the tapes private Nixon losing his re-election

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:


The Supreme Court case United States vs. Nixon led to limits to executive privilege.

It wasn't gaining executive privilege because Nixon was going to be impeached, but he resigned before he was removed.

He didn't get to keep the tapes private.

He didn't have a chance to lose his re-election, he resigned.

Hope this helps.

Answer 2
Answer:

It led him to gain executive privilege limits. Because of what he had done, and was accused of being a crook


Related Questions

The goal of President Harry Truman’s Fair Deal was to
In what way were Korea and Germany similarafter World War II?(1) They refused to align with the superpowers.(2) Their former emperors stood trial for warcrimes.(3) Both remained divided during the Cold War.(4) Ethnic tensions threatened civil war in eachcountry.
Why and when did the church split into Catholic and Orthodox Christianity​
Why was it necessary to pass the Thirteenth Amendment after the Emancipation Proclamation had been issued?
Which of the Progressive Constitutional amendments addressed the issue of the election of U.S. senators? Sixteenth Seventeenth Eighteenth Nineteenth

When did america declare independence

Answers

The United States of America declared independence from Great Britain on July 4th, 1776.

Answer:

July 4th

Explanation:

Which of the following opened in October of 1990, allowing East and West Germany to be united, effectivily ending Communism in Germany?A) Iron Curtain
B) Red Bloc
C) Berlin Wall
D) Soviet Stage

Answers

The correct answer is the Berlin Wall (C). The reason for this is because the Berlin wall was an actual wall that was dividing both parts of Berlin. This division came after World War II because the city was under Soviet control on one side and under the control of USA, Britain and the French on the other side. 

Berlin wall is the answer. Hope i helped.

A single machine gun was worth how many rifles? Why

Answers

because a single machine gun could take out half a squad within minutes it would take a rifle much much longer to do the same thing so machine guns are seen as superior

Final answer:

A single machine gun is worth 4 rifles.

Explanation:

In order to determine how many rifles a single machine gun is worth, we need to establish a ratio or conversion factor. This can be done by finding the value or cost of both the machine gun and the rifles. Let's say a machine gun is worth $2000 and a rifle is worth $500. To find out how many rifles a machine gun is worth, we divide the value of the machine gun by the value of a rifle: 2000 / 500 = 4. Therefore, a single machine gun is worth 4 rifles.

Learn more about Value comparison here:

brainly.com/question/31455586

#SPJ2

For a World War II research paper on political regimes, you decide to use a Venn diagram to better understand the political differences between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia. Which historical analysis method are you using?

Answers

Compare and Contrast.

Answer IS A

Explanation:

Why did some feminists criticize Friedan for ideas in The Second Stage?

Answers

Some feminists criticized Betty Friedan for her ideas in "The Second Stage" because they believed that her emphasis on women's traditional roles undermined the broader goals of gender equality, excluding the experiences of marginalized women and neglecting the intersectional aspects of feminism.

Some feminists criticized Betty Friedan for her ideas in "The Second Stage" because they felt that her focus on women's roles within the traditional family structure perpetuated gender norms and failed to address the broader systemic issues that marginalized women face.

They argued that her emphasis on the nuclear family as the primary site of women's fulfillment ignored the diverse experiences and needs of women, particularly those from marginalized communities.

These critics believed that Friedan's approach ignored the intersectional aspects of feminism and called for a more inclusive and intersectional feminism that tackled multiple forms of oppression and prioritized the voices and concerns of all women.

For more such questions on Betty Friedan:

brainly.com/question/3406842

#SPJ8

Why did George Washington refuse to take slavery for being Commander in Cheif?A. He was a rich man.
B. The slavery was not high enough.
C. He believed a commander should not profit from war.
D. His wife was already on the government payroll.
I think it's C, but I'm not sure

Answers

Answer:

The Correct Answer is C

Explanation:

  • George Washington rejected to receive a payroll for being commander in chief because he considered a leader should not benefit from battle. He wanted to assist the nation.
  • He also declined to receive a payroll as a President of the United States. He was a gentleman that had fields and property, so he did not require the payment.
From what I remember and was taught George Washington lived a life of regret after the war because he had slaves.... but that's all I can remember