Answer:
the Vietnam war
Answer:
test-retest reliability
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the psychological construct missing from this intelligence test is test-retest reliability. This is a measure to see how reliable the results of a test are, and is done by administering the same test twice, after a set amount of time has passed. Such as the researcher has done in this scenario.
Answer: test-retest reliability
Explanation: In other to validate the outcome of a test or an experiment, researchers may often repeat a particular test more than once, in other to ensure that conclusion or inference drawn from the first or initial test aren't wrong. This is known as test-retest reliability. Test retest reliability involves, that the test retaken is performed under the the same condition as the first. This is to ensure that observed differences aren't due to changes in experimental conditions. In the context above, the test was conducted twice using the same participant and condition, in other to establish the validity or reliability of the first or initial test. Since the outcome of the first and second test do not conform, the intelligence test lacks test retest reliability.
I think the best thing to do is to report it to the police as suspicious activity. As a citizen you have the obligation to colaborate in the mainteneance of a healthy society in which everyone's rights are respected. It all indicates that these women rights have been denied. Police departments suggest to report any suspicious activity even if you are not sure, they will make an investigation and find out what is really going on. If nothing is out of the law then nothing bad will happen, if something is illegal there will be legal consequences.
Answer:
Personally I would ask to speak with a manager and see what they would do, if they pointed me in the right direction I would talk with him and see if anything seemed odd. If I still got that feeling I would talk to the police about it and let them do the investigating.
Given Alexander the Great's unmatched military capabilities, it's possible he would have been successful as a ruler. However, ruling demands different skills than conquering, and the strife that followed his death suggests maintaining control of his vast, diverse empire would have been challenging.
If Alexander had lived longer, it's certainly possible that he would have been as successful a ruler as he was a conqueror, but it's also difficult to say for sure. Alexander the Great was a masterful military tactician and struck fear into his enemies, but he also faced mutinies and revolts within his own forces. His short life didn't give him much time to prove his abilities as a long-term ruler, especially given the size and diversity of the territories he'd acquired.
Furthermore, the period following his death saw much strife and contention among his generals and their descendants who tried to seize control of different parts of his empire. This suggests that while Alexander was unmatched in achieving military conquests, maintaining control and harmony among these regions were altogether a different challenge.
However, Alexander demonstrated some political acumen, like adopting Persian customs to consolidate his control over the Persian Empire. But, we must remember that ruling an empire demands constant strategic planning, administrative oversight, and diplomatic relationships, which provide different types of challenges than wartime leadership.
#SPJ2
Answer:
In ancient Rome the type of government was REPUBLIC.
Romans were pioneers in many fields such as politics, education, art, etc.
They established as a form of government "the republic" in which, for example, citizens could be elected members of the Senate. This model was imitated by many countries such as the United States for centuries.
Explanation:
I hope this is the answer that you're looking for. !
Answer:
the new constitution of Nepal has introduced a three-tier structure of federal government and all three levels have the constitutional power to enact laws, prepare budgets, and mobize their own resources.
Answer:
The new constitution of Nepal has introduced a three-tier structure of federal government (federal, province, and local) and all three levels have the constitutional power to enact laws, prepare budgets, and mobilize their own resources.
Explanation: