The sentence which lacks parallelstructureis:
This refers to the way a textisarrangedto make the words have similar structureand arrangement.
Based on this and from the availableoptions, we can note that optionBdoes not make use of parallelstructure because of how it uses differentstructuresto describe Isabela's abilities.
Read more about parallelismhere:
How does the narration affect the narrator’s credibility in this excerpt?
His honesty renders him earnest and genuine.
His slang makes him seem youthful and intriguing.
His French jargon makes him seem international.
His explanations depict him as a bit defensive.
His explanations depict him as a bit defensive.
The question is asking about his credibility or ability to be deemed as trustworthy. Option B and C should automatically be eliminated because they do not actually have anything to do with credibility. Because his explanations are being used to show how he is "not just a jock", he is coming across as defensive. He is trying to prove to his audience that even though he did cheat some, he is still capable of doing the work and succeeding as evidence by his prior grades. He doesn't want them to see him as a stereotyped dumb jock, but instead as an intelligent and capable person.
B. mandatory
C. cohesive
D. loyalty
A.
past perfect
B.
present perfect
C.
present
D.
present progressive